Honor 200 Smart
Honor
PKR 73,999
67/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Honor 200 Smart vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 22 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Tecno Camon 30 5G is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 83 against 67 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Tecno Camon 30 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 69,999 against PKR 73,999.
Tecno Camon 30 5G
Tecno
PKR 69,999
83/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedTecno Camon 30 5G takes it by 16.3 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Camon 30 5G costs PKR 4,000 less.
- Honor 200 Smart packs a 200 mAh larger battery.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G charges 35W faster.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G offers 8 GB more RAM.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G ships with 256 GB more storage.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Camon 30 5G if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging, display, memory & storage and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Honor 200 Smart | Tecno Camon 30 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 73,999 | PKR 69,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | September 2024 | April 2024 |
| Dimensions | 166.9 × 76.8 × 8.09 mm | Glass Back: 165.4 × 75.9 × 7.8 mm Eco Leather: 165.4 × 75.9 × 8.0 mm |
| Weight | 191 g (Midnight Black); approximately 193 g (Forest Green) Better | 199 g |
| Water resistance | IP64 (dust and splash resistant) | IP53 (Dust protected & splash resistant) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8 inches Better | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2412 pixels | 1080 × 2436 pixels (FHD+) Better |
| Panel type | TFT LCD 120Hz | AMOLED 120Hz |
| Protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Basic reinforced glass (manufacturer not disclosed) |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core — 2× Cortex-A78 at 2.2GHz + 6× Cortex-A55 at 1.95GHz | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A78 @ 2.2GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| Operating system | Android 14, MagicOS 8.0 | Android 14 HIOS 14 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 4GB | 8GB / 12GB LPDDR4X (Memory Fusion (Extended RAM) supported) Better |
| Internal storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB UFS 2.2 Better |
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (availability varies by market) |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | Dual 50MP, f/1.8, wide + 2MP, f/2.4, depth PDAF, LED flash, HDR Up to 8× | 50 MP f/1.9 aperture PDAF Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) Secondary 2 MP Depth Sensor Auxiliary Light Sensor Dual LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Camera Portrait Mode Night Mode |
| Selfie camera | 5MP, f/2.2, wide | 50 MP Autofocus (AF) Dual Color Temperature Flash Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30fps (Rear), 1080p@30fps (Front) | 1440p @30fps 1080p @30/60fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5200 mAh Better | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 35W wired charging | 70W Ultra Charge (Wired) 0–50%: Approximately 19 minutes 0–100%: Approximately 45–50 minutes (under optimal conditions) Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Hybrid Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Direct Hotspot |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3 A2DP LE |
| NFC | Region-dependent / not available on some variants | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted fingerprint, accelerometer, proximity sensor, compass | In-display Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Electronic Compass Infrared Remote Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Honor 200 Smart or Tecno Camon 30 5G?
Tecno Camon 30 5G comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 16.3 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging, display, memory & storage and value for money. Honor 200 Smart can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Honor 200 Smart and Tecno Camon 30 5G in Pakistan?
Honor 200 Smart is listed at PKR 73,999 and Tecno Camon 30 5G at PKR 69,999. That makes Tecno Camon 30 5G cheaper by PKR 4,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Honor 200 Smart or Tecno Camon 30 5G?
Tecno Camon 30 5G scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Honor 200 Smart or Tecno Camon 30 5G?
Tecno Camon 30 5G leads on battery. Honor 200 Smart carries a 5200 mAh cell and Tecno Camon 30 5G a 5000 mAh cell, with 35W and 70W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Honor 200 Smart or Tecno Camon 30 5G?
Tecno Camon 30 5G is the stronger gaming phone here. Honor 200 Smart runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) while Tecno Camon 30 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Honor 200 Smart vs Samsung Galaxy F54
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Samsung Galaxy F54
Honor 200 Smart vs Realme Narzo 100x
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Realme Narzo 100x
Honor 200 Smart vs Honor 200 Lite
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Honor 200 Lite
Honor 200 Smart vs Xiaomi Poco M8x
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Xiaomi Poco M8x
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.