Honor X9c
Honor
PKR 99,999
82/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Honor X9c vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 7 Dec 2025.
The short answer
The Honor X9c is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 82 against 65 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Tecno Spark 50 5G still wins on memory & storage and value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Spark 50 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 64,999 against PKR 99,999.
Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno
PKR 64,999
65/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedHonor X9c takes it by 16.6 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Spark 50 5G costs PKR 35,000 less.
- Honor X9c packs a 100 mAh larger battery.
- Honor X9c charges 21W faster.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Honor X9c has a 58 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Honor X9c uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Honor X9c if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging and display.
Buy the Tecno Spark 50 5G if…
you care most about memory & storage and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Honor X9c | Tecno Spark 50 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 99,999 | PKR 64,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | 2024 (Global) — Available; Pakistan availability varies | April 2, 2026 (Global Announcement) |
| Dimensions | 162.8 × 75.5 × 7.98 mm | 167.9 × 79.3 × 8.18 mm |
| Weight | 189 g Better | Around 205–210 g (varies by market) |
| Water resistance | Not listed | IP64 Dust and Water Resistance |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1224 × 2700 pixels Better | 720 × 1600 pixels (HD+) |
| Panel type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1.5K | IPS LCD Up to 700 nits (HBM) 120Hz Adaptive Refresh Rate Eye Care Mode Reading Mode Dark Mode |
| Protection | Ultra-Bounce Anti-Drop Curved Display (2m drop resistance) | Standard scratch-resistant glass (official type not disclosed) |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (4×2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4×1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A76 Performance Cores 6 × Cortex-A55 Efficiency Cores |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Operating system | Android 14 with MagicOS | Android 16 HiOS 16 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8 GB / 12 GB (device dependent) | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB LPDDR4X Supports Memory Fusion (Virtual RAM) up to 16GB (market dependent) Better |
| Internal storage | 256 GB | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 |
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated microSD card slot) |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP (main, OIS) + 5 MP (ultra-wide) Better | 50 MP f/1.8 PDAF AI Lens LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Photography FlashSnap Night Mode Portrait Mode Beauty Mode AI Scene Detection |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP Better | 8 MP Single LED Flash Beauty Mode AI Portrait HDR |
| Video recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps 720p@30fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Non-removable Li-Po 6600 mAh (Silicon-carbon) Better | 6500 mAh (some regional variants list 6150 mAh rated capacity) |
| Wired charging | 66W wired fast charging Better | 45W Super Charging |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct, Hotspot |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | v5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | In-display fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Side-mounted Fingerprint Scanner Accelerometer Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor E-Compass Virtual Gyroscope |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Honor X9c or Tecno Spark 50 5G?
Honor X9c comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 16.6 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging and display. Tecno Spark 50 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Honor X9c and Tecno Spark 50 5G in Pakistan?
Honor X9c is listed at PKR 99,999 and Tecno Spark 50 5G at PKR 64,999. That makes Tecno Spark 50 5G cheaper by PKR 35,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Honor X9c or Tecno Spark 50 5G?
Honor X9c scores higher in our camera assessment. Honor X9c uses a 108 MP main sensor against 50 MP on Tecno Spark 50 5G, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Honor X9c or Tecno Spark 50 5G?
Honor X9c leads on battery. Honor X9c carries a 6600 mAh cell and Tecno Spark 50 5G a 6500 mAh cell, with 66W and 45W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Honor X9c or Tecno Spark 50 5G?
Honor X9c is the stronger gaming phone here. Honor X9c runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) while Tecno Spark 50 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Honor X9c vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Honor X9c vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Honor X9c vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Honor X9c vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.