Honor X9e Pro
Honor
PKR 124,999
76/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Honor X9e Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 27 Sep 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 87 against 76 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance and battery & charging. The Honor X9e Pro still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Honor X9e Pro is the cheaper of the two at PKR 124,999 against PKR 289,999.
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Poco
PKR 289,999
87/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi Poco F9 Ultra takes it by 10.8 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Honor X9e Pro costs PKR 165,000 less.
- Honor X9e Pro packs a 2,950 mAh larger battery.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra charges 20W faster.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra ships with 512 GB more storage.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra has a 92 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the Honor X9e Pro if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra if…
you care most about performance and battery & charging.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Honor X9e Pro | Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 124,999 Cheaper | PKR 289,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | September 2026 | September 2026 |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 77.0 x 8.1 mm | 163.49 × 77.94 × 8.74 mm |
| Weight | 203 g Better | 235 g |
| Water resistance | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K | IP68 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8 inches | 6.9-inch Better |
| Resolution | 1.5K (2788 × 1280 pixels) Better | 1200 × 2608 pixels |
| Panel type | OLED 120Hz, 10-bit, 10,000 nits peak brightness, 3840Hz PWM dimming, DCI-P3, HDR | AMOLED 185Hz refresh rate, 12-bit color, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, up to 10,000 nits peak brightness |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 (4nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core, up to 4.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 812 | Adreno GPU, VisionBoost D8 |
| Operating system | Android 16 MagicOS 10 | Android 16, HyperOS 3. |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB (Up to 16GB virtual RAM through HONOR RAM Turbo) | 12GB/16GB LPDDR5X |
| Internal storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB/512GB/1TB UFS 4.1, Better |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP, f/1.75, OIS, PDAF + 5 MP, f/2.2, ultrawide, LED Flash | 200MP, f/1.68, OIS + 50MP periscope telephoto, f/3.0, OIS, 5x optical zoom + 50MP ultrawide, f/2.4 Better |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP, f/2.45, wide, 1080p | 32MP, f/2.2, HDR, Portrait Mode Better |
| Video recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@30fps, Slow-motion up to 1920fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Silicon-carbon battery (Li-Po), non-removable. 11,000 mAh Better | Silicon-carbon battery (non-removable) 8050 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80W wired fast charging, 27W wired reverse charging | 100W wired, 50W wireless, 27W reverse wired, 22.5W reverse wireless Charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby (5G + 5G). | Dual Nano-SIM / eSIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E, dual-band | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0, LC3, LE Audio | 6.0, Dual Bluetooth |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under-display, optical), accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, ambient light sensor, compass. | Ultrasonic Fingerprint Sensor, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic Compass, Gyroscope, IR Blaster, Flicker Sensor, X-Axis Linear Vibration Motor, Color Temperature Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 1 |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Honor X9e Pro or Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra?
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 10.8 points. It wins on performance and battery & charging. Honor X9e Pro can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Honor X9e Pro and Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra in Pakistan?
Honor X9e Pro is listed at PKR 124,999 and Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra at PKR 289,999. That makes Honor X9e Pro cheaper by PKR 165,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which phone has the better battery, Honor X9e Pro or Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra?
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra leads on battery. Honor X9e Pro carries a 11000 mAh cell and Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra a 8050 mAh cell, with 80W and 100W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Honor X9e Pro or Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra?
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra is the stronger gaming phone here. Honor X9e Pro runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 (4nm) while Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Honor X9e Pro vs Tecno Camon Air
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs Tecno Camon Air
Honor X9e Pro vs Vivo Y600
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs Vivo Y600
Honor X9e Pro vs TECNO POVA 8 Pro 5G Tonino Lamborghini Limited Edition
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs TECNO POVA 8 Pro 5G Tonino Lamborghini Limited Edition
Honor X9e Pro vs vivo V80 Lite
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs vivo V80 Lite
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.