Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G
Infinix
PKR 87,999
76/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G vs Tecno Pova Neo
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 4 Sep 2026.
The short answer
The Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 76 against 69 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and display. The Tecno Pova Neo still wins on battery & charging and value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Pova Neo is the cheaper of the two at PKR 36,999 against PKR 87,999.
Tecno Pova Neo
Tecno
PKR 36,999
69/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedInfinix Note 40 Pro 5G takes it by 7 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Pova Neo costs PKR 51,000 less.
- Tecno Pova Neo packs a 1,000 mAh larger battery.
- Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G charges 27W faster.
- Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G offers 10 GB more RAM.
- Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G ships with 128 GB more storage.
- Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G has a 95 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G if…
you care most about performance, camera, display and memory & storage.
Buy the Tecno Pova Neo if…
you care most about battery & charging and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G | Tecno Pova Neo |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 87,999 | PKR 36,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | March 2024 | December 2021 |
| Dimensions | 164.28 × 74.50 × 8.09 mm | 171.4 × 77.3 × 9.1 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | Not officially specified |
| Water resistance | IP53, Dust and Splash Resistant | No official IP rating |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78-inch | 6.8 inches Better |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2436 pixels Better | 720 × 1640 pixels (HD+) |
| Panel type | 3D Curved AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 1300 nits Peak Brightness, 1.07 Billion Colors, 100% DCI-P3 | IPS LCD 120Hz Up to 480 nits |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | No official protection specified |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm) | MediaTek Helio G25 (12nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (2×2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| Operating system | Android 14, XOS 14, | Android 11 HIOS 7.6 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB LPDDR4X , up to 16GB Extended RAM. Better | 4GB / 6GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 2.2. Better | 64GB / 128GB |
| Card slot | No | Dedicated microSDXC slot (expandable storage) |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | Triple Camera, 108MP Main + 2MP + 2MP, OIS, PDAF, 3× Lossless Superzoom, Triple-LED Flash Better | 13 MP (Wide), Autofocus AI Secondary Lens Quad-LED Flash HDR Panorama Face Detection |
| Selfie camera | 32MP, f/2.2, Wide, Fixed Focus, HDR Better | 8 MP Dual LED Flash HDR |
| Video recording | 2K@30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Po (Non-removable) 5000 mAh | Li-Ion (non-removable) 6000 mAh Better |
| Wired charging | 45W Wired Fast Charging, 20W Wireless MagCharge. All-Round FastCharge 2.0 Better | 18W Fast Charging |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Wi-Fi Direct Hotspot |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under-display, optical), Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, E-Compass. | Rear-mounted Fingerprint Scanner Accelerometer Proximity Sensor Compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G or Tecno Pova Neo?
Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 7 points. It wins on performance, camera, display and memory & storage. Tecno Pova Neo can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G and Tecno Pova Neo in Pakistan?
Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G is listed at PKR 87,999 and Tecno Pova Neo at PKR 36,999. That makes Tecno Pova Neo cheaper by PKR 51,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G or Tecno Pova Neo?
Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G scores higher in our camera assessment. Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G uses a 108 MP main sensor against 13 MP on Tecno Pova Neo, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G or Tecno Pova Neo?
Tecno Pova Neo leads on battery. Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G carries a 5000 mAh cell and Tecno Pova Neo a 6000 mAh cell, with 45W and 18W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G or Tecno Pova Neo?
Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G is the stronger gaming phone here. Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm) while Tecno Pova Neo runs the MediaTek Helio G25 (12nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G vs Infinix Note 50 Pro Racing Edition
Tecno Pova Neo vs Infinix Note 50 Pro Racing Edition
Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G vs Tecno Spark 50s
Tecno Pova Neo vs Tecno Spark 50s
Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G vs Oppo A7 Pro
Tecno Pova Neo vs Oppo A7 Pro
Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Poco X8
Tecno Pova Neo vs Xiaomi Poco X8
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.