itel City 200
itel
PKR 28,999
69/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
itel City 200 vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 22 Apr 2026.
The short answer
The Tecno Camon 30 5G is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 78 against 69 on our combined specification score. It leads on camera, battery & charging and display. The itel City 200 still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The itel City 200 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 28,999 against PKR 69,999.
Tecno Camon 30 5G
Tecno
PKR 69,999
78/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedTecno Camon 30 5G takes it by 9.2 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- itel City 200 costs PKR 41,000 less.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G charges 60W faster.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G offers 8 GB more RAM.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G ships with 384 GB more storage.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G has a 37 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the itel City 200 if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the Tecno Camon 30 5G if…
you care most about camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage.
Not enough published data to score: Performance. Those categories are excluded from the overall figure rather than estimated.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | itel City 200 | Tecno Camon 30 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 28,999 Cheaper | PKR 69,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | 23 Mar 2026 | April 2024 |
| Dimensions | Not listed | Glass Back: 165.4 × 75.9 × 7.8 mm Eco Leather: 165.4 × 75.9 × 8.0 mm |
| Weight | Not listed | 199 g |
| Water resistance | does not have any official IP rating. | IP53 (Dust protected & splash resistant) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6 Inches | 6.78 inches Better |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 Pixels (HD+) | 1080 × 2436 pixels (FHD+) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD Capacitive Touchscreen 90Hz | AMOLED 120Hz |
| Protection | Not listed | Basic reinforced glass (manufacturer not disclosed) |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Not listed | MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm) |
| CPU | Octa core | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A78 @ 2.2GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz |
| GPU | Not listed | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| Operating system | Android 13 (Go Edition) | Android 14 HIOS 14 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 4GB (+ virtual RAM support) | 8GB / 12GB LPDDR4X (Memory Fusion (Extended RAM) supported) Better |
| Internal storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB UFS 2.2 Better |
| Card slot | microSD Card (supports expansion) | microSDXC (availability varies by market) |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | Dual Camera 13 MP LED Flash, HDR | 50 MP f/1.9 aperture PDAF Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) Secondary 2 MP Depth Sensor Auxiliary Light Sensor Dual LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Camera Portrait Mode Night Mode Better |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 50 MP Autofocus (AF) Dual Color Temperature Flash Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30fps | 1440p @30fps 1080p @30/60fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Po (non-removable) 5000 mAh | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 10W standard charging | 70W Ultra Charge (Wired) 0–50%: Approximately 19 minutes 0–100%: Approximately 45–50 minutes (under optimal conditions) Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual standby) | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Direct Hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3 A2DP LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint Sensor (Side-mounted) Accelerometer, proximity | In-display Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Electronic Compass Infrared Remote Sensor |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, itel City 200 or Tecno Camon 30 5G?
Tecno Camon 30 5G comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 9.2 points. It wins on camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage. itel City 200 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of itel City 200 and Tecno Camon 30 5G in Pakistan?
itel City 200 is listed at PKR 28,999 and Tecno Camon 30 5G at PKR 69,999. That makes itel City 200 cheaper by PKR 41,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, itel City 200 or Tecno Camon 30 5G?
Tecno Camon 30 5G scores higher in our camera assessment. itel City 200 uses a 13 MP main sensor against 50 MP on Tecno Camon 30 5G, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, itel City 200 or Tecno Camon 30 5G?
Tecno Camon 30 5G leads on battery. itel City 200 carries a 5000 mAh cell and Tecno Camon 30 5G a 5000 mAh cell, with 10W and 70W wired charging respectively.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
itel City 200 vs Tecno Spark 20C
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Spark 20C
itel City 200 vs Tecno Spark 20
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Spark 20
itel City 200 vs Tecno Spark Go 2024
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Spark Go 2024
itel City 200 vs Tecno Spark 30C
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Spark 30C
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.