Motorola Razr 50
Motorola
PKR 229,999
74/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Motorola Razr 50 vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 24 Jan 2026.
The short answer
The Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 79 against 74 on our combined specification score. It leads on battery & charging and value for money. The Motorola Razr 50 still wins on camera and display, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 74,999 against PKR 229,999.
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Tecno
PKR 74,999
79/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedTecno Camon 19 Pro 5G takes it by 4.1 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G costs PKR 155,000 less.
- Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G packs a 800 mAh larger battery.
- Motorola Razr 50 offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Motorola Razr 50 ships with 256 GB more storage.
- Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G has a 14 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Motorola Razr 50 uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Motorola Razr 50 if…
you care most about camera, display and memory & storage.
Buy the Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G if…
you care most about battery & charging and value for money.
Not enough published data to score: Performance. Those categories are excluded from the overall figure rather than estimated.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 50 | Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 229,999 | PKR 74,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2024 (Expected / Available in Pakistan via import) | June 2022 |
| Dimensions | 171.3 × 74 × 7.3 mm (folded 88.1 × 74 × 15.9 mm) | 166.7 × 74.3 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 188 g Better | 204.5 g |
| Water resistance | IPX8 (water resistant) | No official IP rating |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9 inches Better | 6.8 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2640 pixels (~413 ppi) Better | 1080 × 2460 pixels (FHD+) |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED, HDR10+, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz Refresh Rate Up to 500 nits (typical) |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Not officially specified |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 810 (6nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (4×2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | 2× Cortex-A76 @ 2.4GHz 6× Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Operating system | Android 14 ( Up to Android 17 (3 major updates) | Android 12 HIOS 8.6 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8 GB / 12 GB Better | 8GB LPDDR4X |
| Internal storage | 256 GB / 512 GB Better | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 |
| Card slot | No | No microSD card support |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP (wide), f/1.7, OIS 13 MP (ultra-wide), 120° | 64MP (Wide, f/1.6, PDAF, OIS, RGBW sensor) 2MP Macro 2MP Depth Quad-LED Flash HDR Panorama OIS + EIS Video Stabilization Night Portrait Better |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP (wide) Better | 16MP HDR, Dual Video |
| Video recording | 4K@30fps 1080p@30/60fps HDR video supported | 1080p@30fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Non-removable Li-Po 4200 mAh | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh Better |
| Wired charging | 33W wired fast charging 15W wireless charging | 33W Flash Charge USB Type-C Charging |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM + eSIM) | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby (Dual SIM) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted fingerprint Accelerometer Gyro Proximity Compass | Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Motorola Razr 50 or Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G?
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 4.1 points. It wins on battery & charging and value for money. Motorola Razr 50 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Motorola Razr 50 and Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G in Pakistan?
Motorola Razr 50 is listed at PKR 229,999 and Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G at PKR 74,999. That makes Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G cheaper by PKR 155,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Motorola Razr 50 or Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G?
Motorola Razr 50 scores higher in our camera assessment. Motorola Razr 50 uses a 50 MP main sensor against 64 MP on Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Motorola Razr 50 or Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G?
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G leads on battery. Motorola Razr 50 carries a 4200 mAh cell and Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G a 5000 mAh cell, with 33W and 33W wired charging respectively.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50 vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
Motorola Razr 50 vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Motorola Razr 50 vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Motorola Razr 50 vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.