OnePlus Ace 5
OnePlus
PKR 88,999
88/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
OnePlus Ace 5 vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 28 Jan 2026.
The short answer
The OnePlus Ace 5 is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 88 against 83 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance and battery & charging. The Tecno Camon 30 5G still wins on camera and memory & storage, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Camon 30 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 69,999 against PKR 88,999.
Tecno Camon 30 5G
Tecno
PKR 69,999
83/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedOnePlus Ace 5 takes it by 4.6 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Camon 30 5G costs PKR 19,000 less.
- OnePlus Ace 5 packs a 1,415 mAh larger battery.
- OnePlus Ace 5 charges 10W faster.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G ships with 256 GB more storage.
Buy the OnePlus Ace 5 if…
you care most about performance and battery & charging.
Buy the Tecno Camon 30 5G if…
you care most about camera, memory & storage and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | OnePlus Ace 5 | Tecno Camon 30 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 88,999 | PKR 69,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | December 26, 2024 (official launch globally/Pakistan) | April 2024 |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 75.8 x 8.1 mm | Glass Back: 165.4 × 75.9 × 7.8 mm Eco Leather: 165.4 × 75.9 × 8.0 mm |
| Weight | 206 g | 199 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP65 (dust/water resistant) | IP53 (Dust protected & splash resistant) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi) Better | 1080 × 2436 pixels (FHD+) |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED 120Hz |
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | Basic reinforced glass (manufacturer not disclosed) |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (SM8650-AB) | MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (1×3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3×3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2×3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2×2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A78 @ 2.2GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| Operating system | Android 15 with ColorOS 15 | Android 14 HIOS 14 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8GB / 12GB LPDDR4X (Memory Fusion (Extended RAM) supported) |
| Internal storage | 256 GB | 256GB / 512GB UFS 2.2 Better |
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (availability varies by market) |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP (wide) + 8 MP (ultrawide) + 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP f/1.9 aperture PDAF Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) Secondary 2 MP Depth Sensor Auxiliary Light Sensor Dual LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Camera Portrait Mode Night Mode |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP wide | 50 MP Autofocus (AF) Dual Color Temperature Flash Better |
| Video recording | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps (front), gyro-EIS | 1440p @30fps 1080p @30/60fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Non-removable Si/C Li-Ion 6415 mAh Better | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80W fast charging (est.) Better | 70W Ultra Charge (Wired) 0–50%: Approximately 19 minutes 0–100%: Approximately 45–50 minutes (under optimal conditions) |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Direct Hotspot |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 A2DP LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under-display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | In-display Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Electronic Compass Infrared Remote Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, OnePlus Ace 5 or Tecno Camon 30 5G?
OnePlus Ace 5 comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 4.6 points. It wins on performance and battery & charging. Tecno Camon 30 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of OnePlus Ace 5 and Tecno Camon 30 5G in Pakistan?
OnePlus Ace 5 is listed at PKR 88,999 and Tecno Camon 30 5G at PKR 69,999. That makes Tecno Camon 30 5G cheaper by PKR 19,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, OnePlus Ace 5 or Tecno Camon 30 5G?
Tecno Camon 30 5G scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, OnePlus Ace 5 or Tecno Camon 30 5G?
OnePlus Ace 5 leads on battery. OnePlus Ace 5 carries a 6415 mAh cell and Tecno Camon 30 5G a 5000 mAh cell, with 80W and 70W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, OnePlus Ace 5 or Tecno Camon 30 5G?
OnePlus Ace 5 is the stronger gaming phone here. OnePlus Ace 5 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (SM8650-AB) while Tecno Camon 30 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
OnePlus Ace 5 vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
OnePlus Ace 5 vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
OnePlus Ace 5 vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
OnePlus Ace 5 vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.