Oppo A7 Pro
Oppo
PKR 79,999
60/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Oppo A7 Pro vs Oppo Reno 16
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 13 Sep 2026.
The short answer
The Oppo Reno 16 is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 75 against 60 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Oppo A7 Pro still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Oppo A7 Pro is the cheaper of the two at PKR 79,999 against PKR 199,999.
Oppo Reno 16
Oppo
PKR 199,999
75/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedOppo Reno 16 takes it by 14.5 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Oppo A7 Pro costs PKR 120,000 less.
- Oppo A7 Pro packs a 1,510 mAh larger battery.
- Oppo Reno 16 charges 35W faster.
- Oppo Reno 16 offers 4 GB more RAM.
Buy the Oppo A7 Pro if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the Oppo Reno 16 if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging and memory & storage.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Oppo A7 Pro | Oppo Reno 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 79,999 Cheaper | PKR 199,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | September 2026 | July 2, 2026 |
| Dimensions | 159.08 × 75.81 × 8.80 mm | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2/8.4 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 182 g / 193 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP69K | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.57 inches Better | 6.32-inch |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2372 pixels, FHD+ | 2640 x 1216 Pixels Better |
| Panel type | AMOLED / OLED 120Hz 10-bit / 1.07 billion colors 1,400 nits | AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 460 PPI, 1.07 Billion Colors, 10-bit Color Depth, 1800 nits HBM Brightness, 100% DCI-P3, HDR10+ |
| Protection | Panda Glass | Crystal Guard+ AMOLED Protection |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6360 Max | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core, up to 2.4 GHz | Octa-Core, 1×2.8GHz + 4×2.4GHz + 3×1.8GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 722 |
| Operating system | Android 16, ColorOS 16, | Android 16, ColorOS 16.0 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB LPDDR4X | 12GB LPDDR5X Better |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 2.2 | 256GB UFS 3.1 |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP + Auxiliary Camera, f/1.9, PDAF, LED Flash | 50MP, f/1.8, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.8, 3.5x Optical Zoom, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.0, 116° Ultrawide, Autofocus |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP, f/2.1, 25mm (wide) | 50MP, f/2.0, 100° FOV, 5P Lens, Autofocus, HDR, Portrait, Night Mode, Panorama, Retouch, Up to 2x Digital Zoom Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@60/30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps, EIS/OIS, 1080p Slow Motion@120fps, 720p Slow Motion@240/120fps, HDR Video, Time-Lapse, Dual-View Video, Up to 3.5x Optical Zoom & 18x Digital Zoom |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 8000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po Battery Better | Si/C Li-Ion, Non-Removable 6490mAh |
| Wired charging | 45W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging | 80W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging, 55W PPS, 13.5W USB PD & 13.5W QC Support Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual-Band, 5GHz 160MHz, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi Direct, 2x2 MIMO |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Electronic Compass, Under-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, E-Compass, In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Oppo A7 Pro or Oppo Reno 16?
Oppo Reno 16 comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 14.5 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging and memory & storage. Oppo A7 Pro can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Oppo A7 Pro and Oppo Reno 16 in Pakistan?
Oppo A7 Pro is listed at PKR 79,999 and Oppo Reno 16 at PKR 199,999. That makes Oppo A7 Pro cheaper by PKR 120,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Oppo A7 Pro or Oppo Reno 16?
Oppo Reno 16 scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Oppo A7 Pro or Oppo Reno 16?
Oppo Reno 16 leads on battery. Oppo A7 Pro carries a 8000 mAh cell and Oppo Reno 16 a 6490 mAh cell, with 45W and 80W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Oppo A7 Pro or Oppo Reno 16?
Oppo Reno 16 is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo A7 Pro runs the MediaTek Dimensity 6360 Max while Oppo Reno 16 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Oppo A7 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X8
Oppo Reno 16 vs Xiaomi Poco X8
Oppo A7 Pro vs Infinix Note 50 Racing Edition
Oppo Reno 16 vs Infinix Note 50 Racing Edition
Oppo A7 Pro vs Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G
Oppo Reno 16 vs Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G
Oppo A7 Pro vs Infinix Note 50 Pro Racing Edition
Oppo Reno 16 vs Infinix Note 50 Pro Racing Edition
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.