Oppo A7 Pro
Oppo
PKR 79,999
60/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Oppo A7 Pro vs vivo X200 Pro
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 13 Sep 2026.
The short answer
The vivo X200 Pro is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 84 against 60 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Oppo A7 Pro still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Oppo A7 Pro is the cheaper of the two at PKR 79,999 against PKR 329,999.
vivo X200 Pro
Vivo
PKR 329,999
84/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedvivo X200 Pro takes it by 23.6 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Oppo A7 Pro costs PKR 250,000 less.
- Oppo A7 Pro packs a 2,000 mAh larger battery.
- vivo X200 Pro charges 45W faster.
- vivo X200 Pro offers 8 GB more RAM.
- vivo X200 Pro ships with 768 GB more storage.
- vivo X200 Pro has a 150 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the Oppo A7 Pro if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the vivo X200 Pro if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging and memory & storage.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Oppo A7 Pro | vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 79,999 Cheaper | PKR 329,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | September 2026 | October 19, 2024 |
| Dimensions | 159.08 × 75.81 × 8.80 mm | 162.4 × 76 × 8.2–8.5 mm |
| Weight | 205 g Better | 223–228 g (varies by color) |
| Water resistance | IP69K | IP68/IP69 dust and water resistance |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.57 inches | 6.78 inches Better |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2372 pixels, FHD+ | 1260 × 2800 pixels (1.5K) Better |
| Panel type | AMOLED / OLED 120Hz 10-bit / 1.07 billion colors 1,400 nits | LTPO AMOLED 120Hz adaptive HDR10+, Dolby Vision |
| Protection | Panda Glass | Armor Glass (vivo Shield Glass) Scratch-resistant reinforced glass Supports HDR10+ and Dolby Vision |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6360 Max | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core, up to 2.4 GHz | Octa-core 1× Cortex-X925 @ 3.63GHz 3× Cortex-X4 @ 3.30GHz 4× Cortex-A720 @ 2.40GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Immortalis-G925 |
| Operating system | Android 16, ColorOS 16, | Android 15 Funtouch OS 15 (Global) / OriginOS 5 (China) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB LPDDR4X | 12GB / 16GB Better |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 2.2 | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB UFS 4.0 Better |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP + Auxiliary Camera, f/1.9, PDAF, LED Flash | 50MP Wide, OIS 200MP ZEISS APO Periscope Telephoto, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom 50MP Ultra-wide ZEISS T* coating Laser autofocus LED Flash Better |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP, f/2.1, 25mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0 Autofocus Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K @ 30fps 4K @ 30/60/120fps 1080p @ 30/60fps HDR Video Dolby Vision Video Recording (supported regions) Gyro-EIS OIS Slow Motion Time-Lapse |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 8000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po Battery Better | 6000mAh Silicon-Carbon battery |
| Wired charging | 45W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging | 90W FlashCharge 30W Wireless FlashCharge Reverse wired and wireless charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (market dependent) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/6e/7, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | v5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Electronic Compass, Under-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor | In-display ultrasonic fingerprint Accelerometer Gyroscope Compass Proximity sensor Ambient light sensor Color temperature sensor Laser focus sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Oppo A7 Pro or vivo X200 Pro?
vivo X200 Pro comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 23.6 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging and memory & storage. Oppo A7 Pro can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Oppo A7 Pro and vivo X200 Pro in Pakistan?
Oppo A7 Pro is listed at PKR 79,999 and vivo X200 Pro at PKR 329,999. That makes Oppo A7 Pro cheaper by PKR 250,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Oppo A7 Pro or vivo X200 Pro?
vivo X200 Pro scores higher in our camera assessment. Oppo A7 Pro uses a 50 MP main sensor against 200 MP on vivo X200 Pro, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Oppo A7 Pro or vivo X200 Pro?
vivo X200 Pro leads on battery. Oppo A7 Pro carries a 8000 mAh cell and vivo X200 Pro a 6000 mAh cell, with 45W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Oppo A7 Pro or vivo X200 Pro?
vivo X200 Pro is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo A7 Pro runs the MediaTek Dimensity 6360 Max while vivo X200 Pro runs the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 (3nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Oppo A7 Pro vs Tecno Spark 50s
vivo X200 Pro vs Tecno Spark 50s
Oppo A7 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X8
vivo X200 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X8
Oppo A7 Pro vs Infinix Note 50 Racing Edition
vivo X200 Pro vs Infinix Note 50 Racing Edition
Oppo A7 Pro vs Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G
vivo X200 Pro vs Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.