Oppo A7 Pro
Oppo
PKR 79,999
60/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Oppo A7 Pro vs vivo X200 Ultra
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 13 Sep 2026.
The short answer
The vivo X200 Ultra is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 92 against 60 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Oppo A7 Pro still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Oppo A7 Pro is the cheaper of the two at PKR 79,999 against PKR 257,999.
vivo X200 Ultra
Vivo
PKR 257,999
92/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedvivo X200 Ultra takes it by 32.1 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Oppo A7 Pro costs PKR 178,000 less.
- Oppo A7 Pro packs a 2,000 mAh larger battery.
- vivo X200 Ultra charges 45W faster.
- vivo X200 Ultra offers 8 GB more RAM.
- vivo X200 Ultra ships with 768 GB more storage.
- vivo X200 Ultra has a 150 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the Oppo A7 Pro if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the vivo X200 Ultra if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging and memory & storage.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Oppo A7 Pro | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 79,999 Cheaper | PKR 257,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | September 2026 | April 29, 2025 |
| Dimensions | 159.08 × 75.81 × 8.80 mm | 163.1 × 76.8 × 8.7 mm |
| Weight | 205 g Better | 229 g |
| Water resistance | IP69K | IP68/IP69 Dust & Water Resistant |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.57 inches | 6.82 Inches Better |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2372 pixels, FHD+ | 1440 × 3168 Pixels (QHD+) Better |
| Panel type | AMOLED / OLED 120Hz 10-bit / 1.07 billion colors 1,400 nits | LTPO AMOLED, 1 Billion Colors 120Hz HDR: Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid |
| Protection | Panda Glass | Armor Glass (Vivo Shield Glass) |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6360 Max | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core, up to 2.4 GHz | Octa-Core 2 × 4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Prime Cores 6 × 3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Performance Cores |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 830 |
| Operating system | Android 16, ColorOS 16, | Android 15, OriginOS 5 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB LPDDR4X | 12GB / 16GB LPDDR5X Better |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 2.2 | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB UFS 4.1 Better |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No microSD support |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP + Auxiliary Camera, f/1.9, PDAF, LED Flash | 50 MP (Wide, OIS) 200 MP (Periscope Telephoto, OIS, 3.7x Optical Zoom) 50 MP (Ultra-Wide, OIS) Zeiss Optics Laser AF HDR Panorama Better |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP, f/2.1, 25mm (wide) | 50 MP Wide Autofocus Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps 4K@30/60/120fps Dolby Vision HDR 10-bit Log Recording |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 8000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po Battery Better | Silicon-Carbon Li-Ion (Non-removable) 6000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging | 90W Wired Fast Charging 40W Wireless FlashCharge Reverse Wired Charging Reverse Wireless Charging Bypass Charging Support Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Nano-SIM, Dual Standby) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Dual/Triple Band Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 aptX HD aptX Adaptive aptX Lossless LHDC 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Electronic Compass, Under-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor | Ultrasonic Under-Display Fingerprint Accelerometer Gyroscope Compass Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Hall Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.x OTG Supported |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Oppo A7 Pro or vivo X200 Ultra?
vivo X200 Ultra comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 32.1 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging and memory & storage. Oppo A7 Pro can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Oppo A7 Pro and vivo X200 Ultra in Pakistan?
Oppo A7 Pro is listed at PKR 79,999 and vivo X200 Ultra at PKR 257,999. That makes Oppo A7 Pro cheaper by PKR 178,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Oppo A7 Pro or vivo X200 Ultra?
vivo X200 Ultra scores higher in our camera assessment. Oppo A7 Pro uses a 50 MP main sensor against 200 MP on vivo X200 Ultra, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Oppo A7 Pro or vivo X200 Ultra?
vivo X200 Ultra leads on battery. Oppo A7 Pro carries a 8000 mAh cell and vivo X200 Ultra a 6000 mAh cell, with 45W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Oppo A7 Pro or vivo X200 Ultra?
vivo X200 Ultra is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo A7 Pro runs the MediaTek Dimensity 6360 Max while vivo X200 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Oppo A7 Pro vs Tecno Spark 50s
vivo X200 Ultra vs Tecno Spark 50s
Oppo A7 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X8
vivo X200 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco X8
Oppo A7 Pro vs Infinix Note 50 Racing Edition
vivo X200 Ultra vs Infinix Note 50 Racing Edition
Oppo A7 Pro vs Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G
vivo X200 Ultra vs Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.