Oppo F29 Pro
Oppo
PKR 84,999
76/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 11 Feb 2026.
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 81 against 76 on our combined specification score. It leads on camera, memory & storage and value for money. The Oppo F29 Pro still wins on performance and battery & charging, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 65,999 against PKR 84,999.
Oppo
PKR 84,999
76/100 overall
Full specs & reviewTecno
PKR 65,999
81/100 overall
Full specs & reviewUp to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G takes it by 4.4 points on our weighted spec score.
you care most about performance and battery & charging.
you care most about camera, memory & storage and value for money.
| Specification | Oppo F29 Pro | Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 84,999 | PKR 65,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | January 2025 (official launch) | April 2025 |
| Dimensions | ~161.5 × 74.3 × 7.8 mm | 164.4 × 74.3 × 7.3 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 178 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP54 — dust protected and splash resistant (not waterproof) | IP68/IP69 dust and water resistant (up to 2m for 30 minutes, high-pressure water jets) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7 Inches | 6.78 inches Better |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2412 pixels (FHD+) | 1080 × 2436 pixels (FHD+) Better |
| Panel type | AMOLED, 120Hz HDR support, Always-On Display 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, Always-On Display Curved AMOLED display 120Hz adaptive refresh rate Always-On Display Multi-touch support Up to 1300 nits peak brightness 10-bit color support Eye-care mode |
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (6nm) | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate (6nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (2× Cortex-A78 @ 2.6 GHz + 6× Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz) | 2 × Cortex-A76 @ 2.2GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Operating system | Android 14 ( ColorOS 14) | Android 15 with HiOS 15 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8 GB / 12 GB (LPDDR4X) | 8GB LPDDR4X (Up to 8GB Virtual RAM (16GB total memory) Better |
| Internal storage | 128 GB / 256 GB (UFS 2.2) | 256GB UFS |
| Card slot | Not supported | Dedicated microSDXC Slot |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP, f/1.8 (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/2.4 (depth) Better | 50MP f/1.9 Aperture 23mm Wide Lens 1/1.56" Sensor PDAF Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) Secondary Camera 8MP Ultra-Wide Dual LED Flash HDR Panorama Flicker Sensor AI Photography Night Mode Portrait Mode Super Night AI Eraser AI Image Expansion |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP, f/2.4 | 50MP Autofocus (AF) f/2.5 PDAF HDR AI Beauty Better |
| Video recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K @30fps 4K HDR @60fps (market dependent) 1080p Recording Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Po (non-removable) 5000 mAh | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5200 mAh Better |
| Wired charging | 67W SuperVOOC fast charging ~50% in ~20 minutes (claimed) Better | 45W Flash Charge 50% Charge: About 23 Minutes 100% Charge: About 43 Minutes AI Smart Charging Long-life Battery (Rated for approximately 1,800 charging cycles) |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (dual-band) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-Band Wi-Fi |
| Bluetooth | v5.2 | 5.3 A2DP LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | In-display fingerprint (optical) Accelerometer Gyro Proximity Compass | Under-display Optical Fingerprint Face Unlock Accelerometer Gyroscope Compass Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Geomagnetic Sensor Electronic Compass Infrared Remote Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 4.4 points. It wins on camera, memory & storage and value for money. Oppo F29 Pro can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
Oppo F29 Pro is listed at PKR 84,999 and Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G at PKR 65,999. That makes Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G cheaper by PKR 19,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G scores higher in our camera assessment. Oppo F29 Pro uses a 64 MP main sensor against 50 MP on Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Oppo F29 Pro leads on battery. Oppo F29 Pro carries a 5000 mAh cell and Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G a 5200 mAh cell, with 67W and 45W wired charging respectively.
Oppo F29 Pro is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo F29 Pro runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (6nm) while Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G runs the MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate (6nm).
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.