Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Oppo
PKR 319,999
93/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Oppo Find X8 Ultra vs Tecno Camon Air
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 20 Jun 2026.
The short answer
The Oppo Find X8 Ultra is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 93 against 74 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Tecno Camon Air still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Camon Air is the cheaper of the two at PKR 120,999 against PKR 319,999.
Tecno Camon Air
Tecno
PKR 120,999
74/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedOppo Find X8 Ultra takes it by 18.4 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Camon Air costs PKR 199,000 less.
- Oppo Find X8 Ultra packs a 100 mAh larger battery.
- Oppo Find X8 Ultra charges 55W faster.
- Oppo Find X8 Ultra offers 8 GB more RAM.
- Oppo Find X8 Ultra ships with 768 GB more storage.
Buy the Oppo Find X8 Ultra if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging and memory & storage.
Buy the Tecno Camon Air if…
you care most about value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Oppo Find X8 Ultra | Tecno Camon Air |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 319,999 | PKR 120,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 16, 2025 | September 2, 2026 |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 76.8 x 8.8 mm | 162.8 x 77.7 x 6.4 mm |
| Weight | 226g | 167 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP68/IP69 dust and water resistance | IP68/IP69 dust and water resistance |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.82-inch Better | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (QHD+) Better | 1224 × 2720 pixels |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED display 120Hz adaptive refresh rate Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid | AMOLED 144Hz Always-on display, 2160Hz PWM dimming |
| Protection | Oppo Crystal Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Oryon V2 Phoenix L @ 4.32 GHz 6 × Oryon V2 Phoenix M @ 3.53 GHz | Octa-core (2 × 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6 × 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Operating system | Android 15 ColorOS 15 | Android 16 HiOS 16.3 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB LPDDR5X Better | 8GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB UFS 4.1 Better | 128GB / 256GB |
| Card slot | No microSD support | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP Wide (1-inch sensor, OIS) 50MP Periscope Telephoto (3x optical zoom, OIS) 50MP Periscope Telephoto (6x optical zoom, OIS) 50MP Ultra-Wide (120° FoV) Hasselblad color tuning Laser AF and Spectrum Sensor | 50 MP, f/1.8, PDAF, LED flash |
| Selfie camera | 32MP Wide Camera PDAF autofocus | 32 MP, f/2.5, wide-angle lens |
| Video recording | 4K@30/60/120fps, Dolby Vision HDR | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@30fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 6100 mAh Silicon-Carbon Battery Better | Li-Ion (non-removable) 6000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 100W SUPERVOOC Wired Charging 50W AIRVOOC Wireless Charging 10W Reverse Wireless Charging Reverse Wired Charging Better | 45W wired fast charging |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be Dual-band / Tri-band Wi-Fi 6E Wi-Fi 7 Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 A2DP, LE Audio aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Under-display ultrasonic fingerprint sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Compass Ambient light sensor Color temperature sensor Hall sensor Laser focus sensor Infrared blaster | Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass, Fingerprint (under-display) |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Oppo Find X8 Ultra or Tecno Camon Air?
Oppo Find X8 Ultra comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 18.4 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging and memory & storage. Tecno Camon Air can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Oppo Find X8 Ultra and Tecno Camon Air in Pakistan?
Oppo Find X8 Ultra is listed at PKR 319,999 and Tecno Camon Air at PKR 120,999. That makes Tecno Camon Air cheaper by PKR 199,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Oppo Find X8 Ultra or Tecno Camon Air?
Oppo Find X8 Ultra scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Oppo Find X8 Ultra or Tecno Camon Air?
Oppo Find X8 Ultra leads on battery. Oppo Find X8 Ultra carries a 6100 mAh cell and Tecno Camon Air a 6000 mAh cell, with 100W and 45W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Oppo Find X8 Ultra or Tecno Camon Air?
Oppo Find X8 Ultra is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo Find X8 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) while Tecno Camon Air runs the MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Oppo Find X8 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Tecno Camon Air vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Oppo Find X8 Ultra vs Vivo X500 Ultra
Tecno Camon Air vs Vivo X500 Ultra
Oppo Find X8 Ultra vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Tecno Camon Air vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Oppo Find X8 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 16
Tecno Camon Air vs Oppo Reno 16
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.