Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus
Oppo
PKR 249,999
94/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 9 Feb 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 98 against 94 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance and value for money. The Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus still wins on battery & charging, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus is the cheaper of the two at PKR 249,999 against PKR 252,999.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Poco
PKR 252,999
98/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi Poco F7 Ultra takes it by 3.8 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus costs PKR 3,000 less.
- Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus packs a 1,300 mAh larger battery.
- Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra charges 20W faster.
- Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus ships with 512 GB more storage.
- Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus has a 150 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus if…
you care most about battery & charging.
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra if…
you care most about performance and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 249,999 Cheaper | PKR 252,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 31, 2026 (expected in Pakistan) | March 27, 2025 |
| Dimensions | Not listed | 160.3 × 75.0 × 8.4 mm |
| Weight | Not listed | 212 g |
| Water resistance | Not listed | IP68 Dust & Water Resistance Dust-tight protection Water-resistant up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes (manufacturer-rated) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 in Better | 6.67 Inches |
| Resolution | 1256 × 2760 pixels | 1440 × 3200 Pixels (WQHD+) Better |
| Panel type | OLED, HDR, 144Hz | Flow AMOLED 120Hz HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 68 Billion Colors, Always-On Display |
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | POCO Shield Glass |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (5G) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-Core Processor 2 × Oryon V2 Phoenix L @ 4.32 GHz 6 × Oryon V2 Phoenix M @ 3.53 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G720 | Adreno 830 |
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 15 (HyperOS 2) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB LPDDR5X |
| Internal storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB (UFS 3.1) Better | 256GB / 512GB UFS 4.1 |
| Card slot | No | No microSD card slot |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP main + 50 MP telephoto + 50 MP ultra-wide Better | 50 MP Wide, OIS 50 MP Telephoto, OIS, 2.5x Optical Zoom 32 MP Ultra-Wide, 120° FOV Panorama Night Mode Motion Tracking Focus Pro Mode |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP with 4K video Better | 32 MP Selfie Camera HDR |
| Video recording | 4K@60fps (front), 4K recording (rear) | 8K@24fps 4K@60fps 1080p@240fps 720p@1920fps Slow Motion |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Non-removable Li-Ion 6600 mAh Better | 5300mAh Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Ion Battery (Non-removable) |
| Wired charging | 100W fast charging | 120W HyperCharge Wired Charging 50W Wireless HyperCharge Reverse Wireless Charging Support Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (IP68/IP69 dust & water resistant) | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 Wi-Fi 6E Dual-Band Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4 (aptX HD & LHDC 5) | 6.0 aptX HD aptX Adaptive aptX Lossless LHDC 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes (eSE, HCE, SIM support) | Yes |
| Sensors | Under-display fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, IR blaster, color spectrum | Ultrasonic In-Display Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Compass Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Flicker Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C (SuperVOOC) | USB Type-C 2.0 OTG Support |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus or Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra?
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 3.8 points. It wins on performance and value for money. Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra in Pakistan?
Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus is listed at PKR 249,999 and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra at PKR 252,999. That makes Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus cheaper by PKR 3,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which phone has the better battery, Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus or Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra?
Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus leads on battery. Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus carries a 6600 mAh cell and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra a 5300 mAh cell, with 100W and 120W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus or Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra?
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus runs the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (5G) while Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus vs Huawei nova 16 SE
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Huawei nova 16 SE
Oppo Reno 15 Pro Plus vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.