Oppo Reno 16 Pro Max
Oppo
PKR 229,999
90/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 16 May 2026.
The Oppo Reno 16 Pro Max is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 90 against 81 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, battery & charging and memory & storage. The Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 65,999 against PKR 229,999.
Oppo
PKR 229,999
90/100 overall
Full specs & reviewTecno
PKR 65,999
81/100 overall
Full specs & reviewUp to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
Oppo Reno 16 Pro Max takes it by 9.8 points on our weighted spec score.
you care most about performance, battery & charging and memory & storage.
you care most about value for money.
| Specification | Oppo Reno 16 Pro Max | Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 229,999 | PKR 65,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | Q3 2026 (Rumored) | April 2025 |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 75.1 x 7.9 mm | 164.4 × 74.3 × 7.3 mm |
| Weight | 195g to 205g | 178 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP69 (along with IP68 and IP66) rating. | IP68/IP69 dust and water resistant (up to 2m for 30 minutes, high-pressure water jets) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 Inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2780 Pixels (~450 PPI Density) Better | 1080 × 2436 pixels (FHD+) |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED Capacitive Touchscreen, 1 Billion Colors, Multitouch 120Hz Adaptive Refresh Rate | AMOLED, 120Hz, Always-On Display Curved AMOLED display 120Hz adaptive refresh rate Always-On Display Multi-touch support Up to 1300 nits peak brightness 10-bit color support Eye-care mode |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus Expected | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 / 9550 (Rumored) | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate (6nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core | 2 × Cortex-A76 @ 2.2GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz |
| GPU | Mali-GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Operating system | Android 16 ( ColorOS 16) | Android 15 with HiOS 15 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB LPDDR4X (Up to 8GB Virtual RAM (16GB total memory) |
| Internal storage | 256GB / 512GB Better | 256GB UFS |
| Card slot | No | Dedicated microSDXC Slot |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200MP Main Sensor 50MP Telephoto 50MP Ultra-Wide OIS HDR Panorama LED Flash Better | 50MP f/1.9 Aperture 23mm Wide Lens 1/1.56" Sensor PDAF Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) Secondary Camera 8MP Ultra-Wide Dual LED Flash HDR Panorama Flicker Sensor AI Photography Night Mode Portrait Mode Super Night AI Eraser AI Image Expansion |
| Selfie camera | 50MP Selfie Camera | 50MP Autofocus (AF) f/2.5 PDAF HDR AI Beauty |
| Video recording | HDR, 4K Video | 4K @30fps 4K HDR @60fps (market dependent) 1080p Recording Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Si/C Li-Ion Battery 6500mAh Expected Better | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5200 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80W SuperVOOC Fast Charging Better | 45W Flash Charge 50% Charge: About 23 Minutes 100% Charge: About 43 Minutes AI Smart Charging Long-life Battery (Rated for approximately 1,800 charging cycles) |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual standby) | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-Band Wi-Fi |
| Bluetooth | v5.4 | 5.3 A2DP LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (Under Display, Optical) Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Compass | Under-display Optical Fingerprint Face Unlock Accelerometer Gyroscope Compass Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Geomagnetic Sensor Electronic Compass Infrared Remote Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Oppo Reno 16 Pro Max comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 9.8 points. It wins on performance, battery & charging and memory & storage. Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
Oppo Reno 16 Pro Max is listed at PKR 229,999 and Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G at PKR 65,999. That makes Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G cheaper by PKR 164,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Oppo Reno 16 Pro Max leads on battery. Oppo Reno 16 Pro Max carries a 6500 mAh cell and Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G a 5200 mAh cell, with 80W and 45W wired charging respectively.
Oppo Reno 16 Pro Max is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo Reno 16 Pro Max runs the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 / 9550 (Rumored) while Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G runs the MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate (6nm).
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.