Oppo Reno 16
Oppo
PKR 199,999
79/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Sep 2026.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 85 against 79 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and memory & storage. The Oppo Reno 16 still wins on battery & charging and value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Oppo Reno 16 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 199,999 against PKR 434,999.
Oppo
PKR 199,999
79/100 overall
Full specs & reviewSamsung
PKR 434,999
85/100 overall
Full specs & reviewUp to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra takes it by 5.6 points on our weighted spec score.
you care most about battery & charging and value for money.
you care most about performance, camera and memory & storage.
| Specification | Oppo Reno 16 | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 199,999 Cheaper | PKR 434,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2, 2026 | January 2024 (Available in Pakistan) |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2/8.4 mm | 162.3 × 79.0 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 182 g / 193 g Better | 232 g |
| Water resistance | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K | IP68 (Dust & Water Resistance) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.32-inch | 6.8 inches Better |
| Resolution | 2640 x 1216 Pixels | 1440 × 3120 pixels (~505 ppi) Better |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 460 PPI, 1.07 Billion Colors, 10-bit Color Depth, 1800 nits HBM Brightness, 100% DCI-P3, HDR10+ | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, HDR10+, 120Hz |
| Protection | Crystal Guard+ AMOLED Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Armor |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-Core, 1×2.8GHz + 4×2.4GHz + 3×1.8GHz | Octa-core (1×3.39 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3×3.1 GHz Cortex-A720 + 2×2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 2×2.2 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Adreno 750 |
| Operating system | Android 16, ColorOS 16.0 | Android 14 (upgradable to Android 15) with One UI 6.1 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 12 GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 3.1 | 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB Better |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.8, 3.5x Optical Zoom, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.0, 116° Ultrawide, Autofocus | 200 MP wide (OIS) + 50 MP periscope telephoto (5× optical zoom, OIS) + 10 MP telephoto (3× optical zoom, OIS) + 12 MP ultra-wide Better |
| Selfie camera | 50MP, f/2.0, 100° FOV, 5P Lens, Autofocus, HDR, Portrait, Night Mode, Panorama, Retouch, Up to 2x Digital Zoom Better | 12 MP (wide) |
| Video recording | 4K@60/30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps, EIS/OIS, 1080p Slow Motion@120fps, 720p Slow Motion@240/120fps, HDR Video, Time-Lapse, Dual-View Video, Up to 3.5x Optical Zoom & 18x Digital Zoom | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Si/C Li-Ion, Non-Removable 6490mAh Better | Non-removable Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging, 55W PPS, 13.5W USB PD & 13.5W QC Support Better | 45W wired, 15W wireless, 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM + eSIM, IP68 dust/water resistant) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual-Band, 5GHz 160MHz, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi Direct, 2x2 MIMO | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, E-Compass, In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor | Fingerprint (under-display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity, barometer |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 5.6 points. It wins on performance, camera and memory & storage. Oppo Reno 16 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
Oppo Reno 16 is listed at PKR 199,999 and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra at PKR 434,999. That makes Oppo Reno 16 cheaper by PKR 235,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra scores higher in our camera assessment. Oppo Reno 16 uses a 50 MP main sensor against 200 MP on Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Oppo Reno 16 leads on battery. Oppo Reno 16 carries a 6490 mAh cell and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra a 5000 mAh cell, with 80W and 45W wired charging respectively.
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo Reno 16 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) while Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm).
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.