Oppo Reno 16
Oppo
PKR 199,999
74/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Oppo Reno 16 vs Sharp Aquos Sense10
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Sep 2026.
The short answer
The Sharp Aquos Sense10 is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 79 against 74 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and value for money. The Oppo Reno 16 still wins on battery & charging and memory & storage, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Sharp Aquos Sense10 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 95,999 against PKR 199,999.
Sharp Aquos Sense10
Sharp
PKR 95,999
79/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedSharp Aquos Sense10 takes it by 4.9 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Sharp Aquos Sense10 costs PKR 104,000 less.
- Oppo Reno 16 packs a 1,490 mAh larger battery.
- Oppo Reno 16 charges 53W faster.
- Oppo Reno 16 offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Sharp Aquos Sense10 has a 0.3 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the Oppo Reno 16 if…
you care most about battery & charging and memory & storage.
Buy the Sharp Aquos Sense10 if…
you care most about performance, camera and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno 16 | Sharp Aquos Sense10 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 199,999 | PKR 95,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2, 2026 | released 2025 ( Pakistan) |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2/8.4 mm | ~152 x 71 x 8.9 mm |
| Weight | 182 g / 193 g | 159 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K | Not confirmed |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.32-inch Better | 6.1 inches |
| Resolution | 2640 x 1216 Pixels Better | 1080 x 2432 pixels (FHD+) |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 460 PPI, 1.07 Billion Colors, 10-bit Color Depth, 1800 nits HBM Brightness, 100% DCI-P3, HDR10+ | IGZO OLED 120Hz ~1300 nits (peak) |
| Protection | Crystal Guard+ AMOLED Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm) |
| CPU | Octa-Core, 1×2.8GHz + 4×2.4GHz + 3×1.8GHz | Octa-core |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Adreno 710 |
| Operating system | Android 16, ColorOS 16.0 | Android 14 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X Better | 6GB / 8GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 3.1 | 128GB / 256GB |
| Card slot | No | microSDXC supported |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.8, 3.5x Optical Zoom, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.0, 116° Ultrawide, Autofocus | 50.3 MP (wide, f/1.9, PDAF, OIS) 8 MP (ultrawide) LED flash, HDR, panorama Better |
| Selfie camera | 50MP, f/2.0, 100° FOV, 5P Lens, Autofocus, HDR, Portrait, Night Mode, Panorama, Retouch, Up to 2x Digital Zoom Better | 8 MP (wide) |
| Video recording | 4K@60/30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps, EIS/OIS, 1080p Slow Motion@120fps, 720p Slow Motion@240/120fps, HDR Video, Time-Lapse, Dual-View Video, Up to 3.5x Optical Zoom & 18x Digital Zoom | 4K@30fps, 1080p |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Si/C Li-Ion, Non-Removable 6490mAh Better | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging, 55W PPS, 13.5W USB PD & 13.5W QC Support Better | 27W wired |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Nano-SIM + eSIM (varies by region) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual-Band, 5GHz 160MHz, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi Direct, 2x2 MIMO | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, E-Compass, In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Oppo Reno 16 or Sharp Aquos Sense10?
Sharp Aquos Sense10 comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 4.9 points. It wins on performance, camera and value for money. Oppo Reno 16 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Oppo Reno 16 and Sharp Aquos Sense10 in Pakistan?
Oppo Reno 16 is listed at PKR 199,999 and Sharp Aquos Sense10 at PKR 95,999. That makes Sharp Aquos Sense10 cheaper by PKR 104,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Oppo Reno 16 or Sharp Aquos Sense10?
Sharp Aquos Sense10 scores higher in our camera assessment. Oppo Reno 16 uses a 50 MP main sensor against 50.3 MP on Sharp Aquos Sense10, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Oppo Reno 16 or Sharp Aquos Sense10?
Oppo Reno 16 leads on battery. Oppo Reno 16 carries a 6490 mAh cell and Sharp Aquos Sense10 a 5000 mAh cell, with 80W and 27W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Oppo Reno 16 or Sharp Aquos Sense10?
Sharp Aquos Sense10 is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo Reno 16 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) while Sharp Aquos Sense10 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Oppo Reno 16 vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Sharp Aquos Sense10 vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Oppo Reno 16 vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Sharp Aquos Sense10 vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Oppo Reno 16 vs vivo V80 Lite
Sharp Aquos Sense10 vs vivo V80 Lite
Oppo Reno 16 vs Honor X9e Pro
Sharp Aquos Sense10 vs Honor X9e Pro
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.