Oppo Reno 16
Oppo
PKR 199,999
75/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Oppo Reno 16 vs vivo iQOO Z11
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Sep 2026.
The short answer
The vivo iQOO Z11 is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 91 against 75 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The vivo iQOO Z11 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 129,999 against PKR 199,999.
vivo iQOO Z11
iQOO
PKR 129,999
91/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedvivo iQOO Z11 takes it by 16.4 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- vivo iQOO Z11 costs PKR 70,000 less.
- vivo iQOO Z11 packs a 2,530 mAh larger battery.
- vivo iQOO Z11 charges 10W faster.
- vivo iQOO Z11 offers 4 GB more RAM.
- vivo iQOO Z11 ships with 256 GB more storage.
Buy the vivo iQOO Z11 if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno 16 | vivo iQOO Z11 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 199,999 | PKR 129,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2, 2026 | March 26, 2026 (China) |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2/8.4 mm | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8.3 mm |
| Weight | 182 g / 193 g Better | 213 g |
| Water resistance | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K | IP68/IP69 dust and water resistant |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.32-inch | 6.83 inches Better |
| Resolution | 2640 x 1216 Pixels | 1260 x 2800 pixels (1.5K) Better |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 460 PPI, 1.07 Billion Colors, 10-bit Color Depth, 1800 nits HBM Brightness, 100% DCI-P3, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz |
| Protection | Crystal Guard+ AMOLED Protection | 9H hardness, full-glue tempered glass screen protector |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (China) / Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (Global) |
| CPU | Octa-Core, 1×2.8GHz + 4×2.4GHz + 3×1.8GHz | Octa-core |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Mali-G720 (China) / Adreno 810 (Global) |
| Operating system | Android 16, ColorOS 16.0 | Android 16, OriginOS 6 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB Better |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 3.1 | 256GB / 512GB Better |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.8, 3.5x Optical Zoom, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.0, 116° Ultrawide, Autofocus | 50 MP, wide, OIS 2 MP, depth LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Selfie camera | 50MP, f/2.0, 100° FOV, 5P Lens, Autofocus, HDR, Portrait, Night Mode, Panorama, Retouch, Up to 2x Digital Zoom Better | 16 MP / 32 MP (region dependent) |
| Video recording | 4K@60/30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps, EIS/OIS, 1080p Slow Motion@120fps, 720p Slow Motion@240/120fps, HDR Video, Time-Lapse, Dual-View Video, Up to 3.5x Optical Zoom & 18x Digital Zoom | 4K, 1080p |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Si/C Li-Ion, Non-Removable 6490mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 9020 mAh Better |
| Wired charging | 80W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging, 55W PPS, 13.5W USB PD & 13.5W QC Support | 90W wired fast charging ( Reverse Charging: Supported) Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual standby) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual-Band, 5GHz 160MHz, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi Direct, 2x2 MIMO | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, E-Compass, In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Oppo Reno 16 or vivo iQOO Z11?
vivo iQOO Z11 comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 16.4 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money. Oppo Reno 16 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Oppo Reno 16 and vivo iQOO Z11 in Pakistan?
Oppo Reno 16 is listed at PKR 199,999 and vivo iQOO Z11 at PKR 129,999. That makes vivo iQOO Z11 cheaper by PKR 70,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Oppo Reno 16 or vivo iQOO Z11?
vivo iQOO Z11 scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Oppo Reno 16 or vivo iQOO Z11?
vivo iQOO Z11 leads on battery. Oppo Reno 16 carries a 6490 mAh cell and vivo iQOO Z11 a 9020 mAh cell, with 80W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Oppo Reno 16 or vivo iQOO Z11?
vivo iQOO Z11 is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo Reno 16 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) while vivo iQOO Z11 runs the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (China) / Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (Global).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Oppo Reno 16 vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
vivo iQOO Z11 vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Oppo Reno 16 vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
vivo iQOO Z11 vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Oppo Reno 16 vs vivo V80 Lite
vivo iQOO Z11 vs vivo V80 Lite
Oppo Reno 16 vs Honor X9e Pro
vivo iQOO Z11 vs Honor X9e Pro
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.