Oppo Reno 16
Oppo
PKR 199,999
79/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Sep 2026.
The Vivo X300 Ultra is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 98 against 79 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Oppo Reno 16 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 199,999 against PKR 253,999.
Oppo
PKR 199,999
79/100 overall
Full specs & reviewVivo
PKR 253,999
98/100 overall
Full specs & reviewUp to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
Vivo X300 Ultra takes it by 18.3 points on our weighted spec score.
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging and memory & storage.
| Specification | Oppo Reno 16 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 199,999 Cheaper | PKR 253,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2, 2026 | April 30, 2026 (expected in Pakistan) |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2/8.4 mm | 164.3 × 76.4 × 8.5 mm |
| Weight | 182 g / 193 g Better | 228 g |
| Water resistance | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K | IP68/IP69 dust and water resistance. |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.32-inch | 6.8 inches Better |
| Resolution | 2640 x 1216 Pixels | 1260 × 2800 pixels (~452 ppi) Better |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 460 PPI, 1.07 Billion Colors, 10-bit Color Depth, 1800 nits HBM Brightness, 100% DCI-P3, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Protection | Crystal Guard+ AMOLED Protection | Not officially specified |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 5) |
| CPU | Octa-Core, 1×2.8GHz + 4×2.4GHz + 3×1.8GHz | Octa-core (up to 4.6 GHz) |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating system | Android 16, ColorOS 16.0 | Android 16 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 12 GB / 16 GB Better |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 3.1 | 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB (UFS 4.1) Better |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.8, 3.5x Optical Zoom, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.0, 116° Ultrawide, Autofocus | 200 MP (wide, OIS) + 50 MP periscope telephoto (OIS, 3× optical zoom) + 50 MP ultra-wide Better |
| Selfie camera | 50MP, f/2.0, 100° FOV, 5P Lens, Autofocus, HDR, Portrait, Night Mode, Panorama, Retouch, Up to 2x Digital Zoom | 50 MP wide |
| Video recording | 4K@60/30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps, EIS/OIS, 1080p Slow Motion@120fps, 720p Slow Motion@240/120fps, HDR Video, Time-Lapse, Dual-View Video, Up to 3.5x Optical Zoom & 18x Digital Zoom | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Si/C Li-Ion, Non-Removable 6490mAh | Non-removable Li-Ion 6510 mAh (Si-C battery) Better |
| Wired charging | 80W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging, 55W PPS, 13.5W USB PD & 13.5W QC Support | 120W wired, 50W wireless, 10W reverse charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM (IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual-Band, 5GHz 160MHz, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi Direct, 2x2 MIMO | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, E-Compass, In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor | Ultrasonic under-display fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Vivo X300 Ultra comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 18.3 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging and memory & storage. Oppo Reno 16 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
Oppo Reno 16 is listed at PKR 199,999 and Vivo X300 Ultra at PKR 253,999. That makes Oppo Reno 16 cheaper by PKR 54,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Vivo X300 Ultra scores higher in our camera assessment. Oppo Reno 16 uses a 50 MP main sensor against 200 MP on Vivo X300 Ultra, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads on battery. Oppo Reno 16 carries a 6490 mAh cell and Vivo X300 Ultra a 6510 mAh cell, with 80W and 120W wired charging respectively.
Vivo X300 Ultra is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo Reno 16 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) while Vivo X300 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 5).
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.