Oppo Reno 16
Oppo
PKR 199,999
74/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Oppo Reno 16 vs vivo Y400 Pro
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Sep 2026.
The short answer
The vivo Y400 Pro is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 84 against 74 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and value for money. The Oppo Reno 16 still wins on battery & charging and memory & storage, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The vivo Y400 Pro is the cheaper of the two at PKR 89,999 against PKR 199,999.
vivo Y400 Pro
Vivo
PKR 89,999
84/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedvivo Y400 Pro takes it by 10 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- vivo Y400 Pro costs PKR 110,000 less.
- Oppo Reno 16 packs a 990 mAh larger battery.
- vivo Y400 Pro charges 10W faster.
- Oppo Reno 16 offers 4 GB more RAM.
Buy the Oppo Reno 16 if…
you care most about battery & charging and memory & storage.
Buy the vivo Y400 Pro if…
you care most about performance, camera and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno 16 | vivo Y400 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 199,999 | PKR 89,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2, 2026 | June 2025 |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2/8.4 mm | 163.7 × 75.0 × 7.5 mm (Nebula Purple) / 7.7 mm (Fest Gold/Freestyle White) |
| Weight | 182 g / 193 g | 182 g |
| Water resistance | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K | IP65 (Dust-tight and resistant to water jets) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.32-inch | 6.77 inches Better |
| Resolution | 2640 x 1216 Pixels Better | 1080 × 2392 pixels (FHD+) |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 460 PPI, 1.07 Billion Colors, 10-bit Color Depth, 1800 nits HBM Brightness, 100% DCI-P3, HDR10+ | AMOLED 120 Hz |
| Protection | Crystal Guard+ AMOLED Protection | Not officially specified |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) |
| CPU | Octa-Core, 1×2.8GHz + 4×2.4GHz + 3×1.8GHz | Quad-core Cortex-A78 @ 2.5 GHz Quad-core Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| Operating system | Android 16, ColorOS 16.0 | Android 15 with Funtouch OS 15 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X Better | 8GB LPDDR4X |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 3.1 | 128GB / 256GB UFS 3.1 |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.8, 3.5x Optical Zoom, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.0, 116° Ultrawide, Autofocus | 50 MP, f/1.79, PDAF 2 MP Depth Sensor LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Photography |
| Selfie camera | 50MP, f/2.0, 100° FOV, 5P Lens, Autofocus, HDR, Portrait, Night Mode, Panorama, Retouch, Up to 2x Digital Zoom Better | 32 MP |
| Video recording | 4K@60/30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps, EIS/OIS, 1080p Slow Motion@120fps, 720p Slow Motion@240/120fps, HDR Video, Time-Lapse, Dual-View Video, Up to 3.5x Optical Zoom & 18x Digital Zoom | Up to 4K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Si/C Li-Ion, Non-Removable 6490mAh Better | 5500 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po battery |
| Wired charging | 80W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging, 55W PPS, 13.5W USB PD & 13.5W QC Support | 90W FlashCharge Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual-Band, 5GHz 160MHz, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi Direct, 2x2 MIMO | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band (2.4GHz & 5GHz) Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 | 5.4 A2DP LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, E-Compass, In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor | In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Electronic Compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 OTG Supported |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Oppo Reno 16 or vivo Y400 Pro?
vivo Y400 Pro comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 10 points. It wins on performance, camera and value for money. Oppo Reno 16 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Oppo Reno 16 and vivo Y400 Pro in Pakistan?
Oppo Reno 16 is listed at PKR 199,999 and vivo Y400 Pro at PKR 89,999. That makes vivo Y400 Pro cheaper by PKR 110,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Oppo Reno 16 or vivo Y400 Pro?
vivo Y400 Pro scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Oppo Reno 16 or vivo Y400 Pro?
Oppo Reno 16 leads on battery. Oppo Reno 16 carries a 6490 mAh cell and vivo Y400 Pro a 5500 mAh cell, with 80W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Oppo Reno 16 or vivo Y400 Pro?
vivo Y400 Pro is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo Reno 16 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) while vivo Y400 Pro runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Oppo Reno 16 vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
vivo Y400 Pro vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Oppo Reno 16 vs Motorola Edge 70 Max
vivo Y400 Pro vs Motorola Edge 70 Max
Oppo Reno 16 vs Google Pixel 11
vivo Y400 Pro vs Google Pixel 11
Oppo Reno 16 vs vivo V80 Lite
vivo Y400 Pro vs vivo V80 Lite
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.