Oppo Reno 16
Oppo
PKR 199,999
77/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Oppo Reno 16 vs Xiaomi 15T
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Sep 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi 15T is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 90 against 77 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and memory & storage. The Oppo Reno 16 still wins on battery & charging, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Xiaomi 15T is the cheaper of the two at PKR 169,999 against PKR 199,999.
Xiaomi 15T
Xiaomi
PKR 169,999
90/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi 15T takes it by 12.8 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Xiaomi 15T costs PKR 30,000 less.
- Oppo Reno 16 packs a 990 mAh larger battery.
- Oppo Reno 16 charges 13W faster.
- Xiaomi 15T ships with 256 GB more storage.
Buy the Oppo Reno 16 if…
you care most about battery & charging.
Buy the Xiaomi 15T if…
you care most about performance, camera, memory & storage and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno 16 | Xiaomi 15T |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 199,999 | PKR 169,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2, 2026 | September 24, 2025 (available) |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2/8.4 mm | 163.2 × 78.0 × 7.5 mm |
| Weight | 182 g / 193 g Better | 194 g |
| Water resistance | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K | Not listed |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.32-inch | 6.83 inches Better |
| Resolution | 2640 x 1216 Pixels | 1280 × 2772 pixels (~447 ppi) Better |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 460 PPI, 1.07 Billion Colors, 10-bit Color Depth, 1800 nits HBM Brightness, 100% DCI-P3, HDR10+ | AMOLED (68-billion-colour), HDR10+, 120 Hz |
| Protection | Crystal Guard+ AMOLED Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra (4 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-Core, 1×2.8GHz + 4×2.4GHz + 3×1.8GHz | Octa-core (1×3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 + 3×3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 + 4×2.1 GHz Cortex-A725) |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Mali-G720 MP7 |
| Operating system | Android 16, ColorOS 16.0 | Android 15 with HyperOS 2 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 12 GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 3.1 | 256 GB / 512 GB Better |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.8, 3.5x Optical Zoom, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.0, 116° Ultrawide, Autofocus | 50 MP wide (OIS) + 50 MP telephoto (2× optical zoom) + 12 MP ultra-wide |
| Selfie camera | 50MP, f/2.0, 100° FOV, 5P Lens, Autofocus, HDR, Portrait, Night Mode, Panorama, Retouch, Up to 2x Digital Zoom Better | 32 MP wide |
| Video recording | 4K@60/30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps, EIS/OIS, 1080p Slow Motion@120fps, 720p Slow Motion@240/120fps, HDR Video, Time-Lapse, Dual-View Video, Up to 3.5x Optical Zoom & 18x Digital Zoom | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p up to 240fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Si/C Li-Ion, Non-Removable 6490mAh Better | Non-removable Li-Po ~5500 mAh (typical) |
| Wired charging | 80W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging, 55W PPS, 13.5W USB PD & 13.5W QC Support Better | 67 W wired charging; no wireless charging |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM support, IP68 dust/water resistant |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual-Band, 5GHz 160MHz, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi Direct, 2x2 MIMO | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 | Bluetooth 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, E-Compass, In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor | Fingerprint (under-display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C (USB 2.0), OTG support |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Oppo Reno 16 or Xiaomi 15T?
Xiaomi 15T comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 12.8 points. It wins on performance, camera, memory & storage and value for money. Oppo Reno 16 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Oppo Reno 16 and Xiaomi 15T in Pakistan?
Oppo Reno 16 is listed at PKR 199,999 and Xiaomi 15T at PKR 169,999. That makes Xiaomi 15T cheaper by PKR 30,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Oppo Reno 16 or Xiaomi 15T?
Xiaomi 15T scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Oppo Reno 16 or Xiaomi 15T?
Oppo Reno 16 leads on battery. Oppo Reno 16 carries a 6490 mAh cell and Xiaomi 15T a 5500 mAh cell, with 80W and 67W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Oppo Reno 16 or Xiaomi 15T?
Xiaomi 15T is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo Reno 16 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) while Xiaomi 15T runs the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra (4 nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Oppo Reno 16 vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Xiaomi 15T vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Oppo Reno 16 vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Xiaomi 15T vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Oppo Reno 16 vs vivo V80 Lite
Xiaomi 15T vs vivo V80 Lite
Oppo Reno 16 vs Honor X9e Pro
Xiaomi 15T vs Honor X9e Pro
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.