Oppo Reno 16
Oppo
PKR 199,999
76/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Oppo Reno 16 vs Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Sep 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 94 against 76 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and memory & storage. The Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro is the cheaper of the two at PKR 164,999 against PKR 199,999.
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Poco
PKR 164,999
94/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi Poco F6 Pro takes it by 18.1 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro costs PKR 35,000 less.
- Oppo Reno 16 packs a 1,490 mAh larger battery.
- Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro charges 40W faster.
- Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro ships with 768 GB more storage.
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro if…
you care most about performance, camera, memory & storage and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno 16 | Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 199,999 | PKR 164,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2, 2026 | May 23, 2024 |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2/8.4 mm | 160.86 × 74.95 × 8.21 mm |
| Weight | 182 g / 193 g Better | 209 g |
| Water resistance | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K | IP54 (dust protected and splash resistant) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.32-inch | 6.67 inches Better |
| Resolution | 2640 x 1216 Pixels | 3200 × 1440 pixels (WQHD+) Better |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 460 PPI, 1.07 Billion Colors, 10-bit Color Depth, 1800 nits HBM Brightness, 100% DCI-P3, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision |
| Protection | Crystal Guard+ AMOLED Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-Core, 1×2.8GHz + 4×2.4GHz + 3×1.8GHz | Octa-core (1×3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 + 2×2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 + 2×2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 + 3×2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Adreno 740 |
| Operating system | Android 16, ColorOS 16.0 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 12GB / 16GB LPDDR5X Better |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 3.1 | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB UFS 4.0 Better |
| Card slot | No | No microSD support |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.8, 3.5x Optical Zoom, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.0, 116° Ultrawide, Autofocus | 50 MP (Light Fusion 800, f/1.6, OIS) 8 MP Ultra-Wide 2 MP Macro OIS HDR Panorama |
| Selfie camera | 50MP, f/2.0, 100° FOV, 5P Lens, Autofocus, HDR, Portrait, Night Mode, Panorama, Retouch, Up to 2x Digital Zoom Better | 16 MP Wide HDR |
| Video recording | 4K@60/30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps, EIS/OIS, 1080p Slow Motion@120fps, 720p Slow Motion@240/120fps, HDR Video, Time-Lapse, Dual-View Video, Up to 3.5x Optical Zoom & 18x Digital Zoom | 8K@24fps 4K recording |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Si/C Li-Ion, Non-Removable 6490mAh Better | Non-removable Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging, 55W PPS, 13.5W USB PD & 13.5W QC Support | 120W wired (100% in ~19 min) Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual-Band, 5GHz 160MHz, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi Direct, 2x2 MIMO | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, E-Compass, In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor | Under-display Optical Fingerprint Accelerometer Gyroscope Compass Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Oppo Reno 16 or Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro?
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 18.1 points. It wins on performance, camera, memory & storage and value for money. Oppo Reno 16 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Oppo Reno 16 and Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro in Pakistan?
Oppo Reno 16 is listed at PKR 199,999 and Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro at PKR 164,999. That makes Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro cheaper by PKR 35,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Oppo Reno 16 or Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro?
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which is better for gaming, Oppo Reno 16 or Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro?
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo Reno 16 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) while Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Oppo Reno 16 vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Oppo Reno 16 vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Oppo Reno 16 vs vivo V80 Lite
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro vs vivo V80 Lite
Oppo Reno 16 vs Honor X9e Pro
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro vs Honor X9e Pro
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.