Oppo Reno 16
Oppo
PKR 199,999
77/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Oppo Reno 16 vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Sep 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 94 against 77 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro is the cheaper of the two at PKR 185,999 against PKR 199,999.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Xiaomi
PKR 185,999
94/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi Poco F7 Pro takes it by 17.2 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro costs PKR 14,000 less.
- Oppo Reno 16 packs a 490 mAh larger battery.
- Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro charges 10W faster.
- Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro ships with 256 GB more storage.
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno 16 | Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 199,999 | PKR 185,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2, 2026 | March 27, 2025 |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2/8.4 mm | 160.3 x 75 x 8.1 mm |
| Weight | 182 g / 193 g Better | 206g |
| Water resistance | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K | IP68 dust & water resistance |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.32-inch | 6.67-inch Better |
| Resolution | 2640 x 1216 Pixels | 1440 x 3200 pixels Better |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 460 PPI, 1.07 Billion Colors, 10-bit Color Depth, 1800 nits HBM Brightness, 100% DCI-P3, HDR10+ | AMOLED display 120Hz refresh rate Dolby Vision & HDR10+ |
| Protection | Crystal Guard+ AMOLED Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) |
| CPU | Octa-Core, 1×2.8GHz + 4×2.4GHz + 3×1.8GHz | Octa-core |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Adreno 750 |
| Operating system | Android 16, ColorOS 16.0 | Android 15( HyperOS 2 ) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 12GB LPDDR5X |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 3.1 | 256GB / 512GB UFS 4.1 storage Better |
| Card slot | No | No microSD card slot officially |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.8, 3.5x Optical Zoom, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.0, 116° Ultrawide, Autofocus | 50MP main camera with OIS 8MP ultrawide camera |
| Selfie camera | 50MP, f/2.0, 100° FOV, 5P Lens, Autofocus, HDR, Portrait, Night Mode, Panorama, Retouch, Up to 2x Digital Zoom Better | 20MP selfie camera |
| Video recording | 4K@60/30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps, EIS/OIS, 1080p Slow Motion@120fps, 720p Slow Motion@240/120fps, HDR Video, Time-Lapse, Dual-View Video, Up to 3.5x Optical Zoom & 18x Digital Zoom | 8K video recording supported |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Si/C Li-Ion, Non-Removable 6490mAh Better | 6000mAh non-removable battery |
| Wired charging | 80W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging, 55W PPS, 13.5W USB PD & 13.5W QC Support | 90W wired HyperCharge fast charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual-Band, 5GHz 160MHz, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi Direct, 2x2 MIMO | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, E-Compass, In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor | In-display fingerprint sensor (ultrasonic) Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity sensor Ambient light sensor Compass IR Blaster X-axis linear vibration motor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Oppo Reno 16 or Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro?
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 17.2 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money. Oppo Reno 16 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Oppo Reno 16 and Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro in Pakistan?
Oppo Reno 16 is listed at PKR 199,999 and Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro at PKR 185,999. That makes Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro cheaper by PKR 14,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Oppo Reno 16 or Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro?
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Oppo Reno 16 or Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro?
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro leads on battery. Oppo Reno 16 carries a 6490 mAh cell and Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro a 6000 mAh cell, with 80W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Oppo Reno 16 or Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro?
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo Reno 16 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) while Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Oppo Reno 16 vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Oppo Reno 16 vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Oppo Reno 16 vs vivo V80 Lite
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro vs vivo V80 Lite
Oppo Reno 16 vs Honor X9e Pro
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro vs Honor X9e Pro
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.