Oppo Reno 16
Oppo
PKR 199,999
77/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Sep 2026.
The Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 95 against 77 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro is the cheaper of the two at PKR 194,999 against PKR 199,999.
Oppo
PKR 199,999
77/100 overall
Full specs & reviewPoco
PKR 194,999
95/100 overall
Full specs & reviewUp to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro takes it by 17.8 points on our weighted spec score.
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money.
| Specification | Oppo Reno 16 | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 199,999 | PKR 194,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2, 2026 | December 31, 2026 (Expected) |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2/8.4 mm | 157.5 x 75.3 x 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 182 g / 193 g Better | 218 g |
| Water resistance | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K | IP68 / IP69 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.32-inch | 6.59 Inches Better |
| Resolution | 2640 x 1216 Pixels Better | 1156 x 2510 Pixels |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 460 PPI, 1.07 Billion Colors, 10-bit Color Depth, 1800 nits HBM Brightness, 100% DCI-P3, HDR10+ | AMOLED, Capacitive Touchscreen 185Hz HDR10+ / HDR Vivid Dolby Vision 4500 nits |
| Protection | Crystal Guard+ AMOLED Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, (3 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-Core, 1×2.8GHz + 4×2.4GHz + 3×1.8GHz | Octa-Core, 2 x 4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6 x 3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating system | Android 16, ColorOS 16.0 | Android 16, HyperOS 3. |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 12GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 3.1 | 256GB / 512GB UFS 4.1 Better |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.8, 3.5x Optical Zoom, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.0, 116° Ultrawide, Autofocus | 200 MP + 50 MP Telephoto + 8 MP Ultrawide, OIS, PDAF, 2.5x Optical Zoom, LED Flash, HDR, Panorama Better |
| Selfie camera | 50MP, f/2.0, 100° FOV, 5P Lens, Autofocus, HDR, Portrait, Night Mode, Panorama, Retouch, Up to 2x Digital Zoom Better | 32 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (wide), HDR |
| Video recording | 4K@60/30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps, EIS/OIS, 1080p Slow Motion@120fps, 720p Slow Motion@240/120fps, HDR Video, Time-Lapse, Dual-View Video, Up to 3.5x Optical Zoom & 18x Digital Zoom | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, Slow-motion up to 960fps/1920fps, Gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Si/C Li-Ion, Non-Removable 6490mAh Better | Li-Ion (non-removable) 6330 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging, 55W PPS, 13.5W USB PD & 13.5W QC Support | 100W Wired, 50W Wireless, 27W Reverse Wired, 22.5W Reverse Wireless, PD 3.0, QC 3+, 100W PPS Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM, up to 2 active SIMs simultaneously |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual-Band, 5GHz 160MHz, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi Direct, 2x2 MIMO | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 | 6.0, A2DP, LE, LHDC 5.0, ASHA, MIHC, Auracast |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, E-Compass, In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor | Fingerprint (under-display, ultrasonic), Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Compass, Color Spectrum Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 17.8 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money. Oppo Reno 16 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
Oppo Reno 16 is listed at PKR 199,999 and Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro at PKR 194,999. That makes Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro cheaper by PKR 5,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro scores higher in our camera assessment. Oppo Reno 16 uses a 50 MP main sensor against 200 MP on Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro leads on battery. Oppo Reno 16 carries a 6490 mAh cell and Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro a 6330 mAh cell, with 80W and 100W wired charging respectively.
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo Reno 16 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) while Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, (3 nm).
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.