Realme Note 60
Realme
PKR 24,999
70/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Realme Note 60 vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 2 Nov 2025.
The short answer
The Tecno Camon 30 5G is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 78 against 70 on our combined specification score. It leads on camera, battery & charging and display. The Realme Note 60 still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Realme Note 60 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 24,999 against PKR 69,999.
Tecno Camon 30 5G
Tecno
PKR 69,999
78/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedTecno Camon 30 5G takes it by 7.4 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Realme Note 60 costs PKR 45,000 less.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G charges 60W faster.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G ships with 448 GB more storage.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G has a 18 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Realme Note 60 if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the Tecno Camon 30 5G if…
you care most about camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage.
Not enough published data to score: Performance. Those categories are excluded from the overall figure rather than estimated.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Realme Note 60 | Tecno Camon 30 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 24,999 Cheaper | PKR 69,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 2024 (launched in Pakistan) | April 2024 |
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 76.7 x 7.8 mm | Glass Back: 165.4 × 75.9 × 7.8 mm Eco Leather: 165.4 × 75.9 × 8.0 mm |
| Weight | 187 g Better | 199 g |
| Water resistance | Not listed | IP53 (Dust protected & splash resistant) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.74 in | 6.78 inches Better |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels (~260 PPI) | 1080 × 2436 pixels (FHD+) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD, Capacitive Touchscreen, 16M Colors, Multitouch, 90Hz | AMOLED 120Hz |
| Protection | Reinforced glass | Basic reinforced glass (manufacturer not disclosed) |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (2 × 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6 × 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A78 @ 2.2GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| Operating system | Android 14 | Android 14 HIOS 14 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 4 GB (+8GB Extended RAM) | 8GB / 12GB LPDDR4X (Memory Fusion (Extended RAM) supported) Better |
| Internal storage | 64 GB | 256GB / 512GB UFS 2.2 Better |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (availability varies by market) |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 32 MP (main), auxiliary lens | 50 MP f/1.9 aperture PDAF Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) Secondary 2 MP Depth Sensor Auxiliary Light Sensor Dual LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Camera Portrait Mode Night Mode Better |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP (wide) | 50 MP Autofocus (AF) Dual Color Temperature Flash Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30fps | 1440p @30fps 1080p @30/60fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Non-removable Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 10W wired | 70W Ultra Charge (Wired) 0–50%: Approximately 19 minutes 0–100%: Approximately 45–50 minutes (under optimal conditions) Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Sim, Dual Standby (Nano-SIM) | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Direct Hotspot |
| Bluetooth | v5.0 | 5.3 A2DP LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass, Fingerprint (side-mounted), Proximity | In-display Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Electronic Compass Infrared Remote Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Realme Note 60 or Tecno Camon 30 5G?
Tecno Camon 30 5G comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 7.4 points. It wins on camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage. Realme Note 60 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Realme Note 60 and Tecno Camon 30 5G in Pakistan?
Realme Note 60 is listed at PKR 24,999 and Tecno Camon 30 5G at PKR 69,999. That makes Realme Note 60 cheaper by PKR 45,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Realme Note 60 or Tecno Camon 30 5G?
Tecno Camon 30 5G scores higher in our camera assessment. Realme Note 60 uses a 32 MP main sensor against 50 MP on Tecno Camon 30 5G, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Realme Note 60 or Tecno Camon 30 5G?
Tecno Camon 30 5G leads on battery. Realme Note 60 carries a 5000 mAh cell and Tecno Camon 30 5G a 5000 mAh cell, with 10W and 70W wired charging respectively.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Realme Note 60 vs Tecno Spark Go 2024
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Spark Go 2024
Realme Note 60 vs Tecno Spark 20
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Spark 20
Realme Note 60 vs Tecno Spark 30C
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Spark 30C
Realme Note 60 vs Tecno Pova Neo
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Pova Neo
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.