Samsung Galaxy A58
Samsung
PKR 169,999
82/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Samsung Galaxy A58 vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 30 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 86 against 82 on our combined specification score. It leads on battery & charging and memory & storage. The Samsung Galaxy A58 still wins on performance and value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Samsung Galaxy A58 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 169,999 against PKR 194,999.
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Poco
PKR 194,999
86/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi Poco F9 Pro takes it by 4.8 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Samsung Galaxy A58 costs PKR 25,000 less.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro packs a 330 mAh larger battery.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro charges 55W faster.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro ships with 256 GB more storage.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro has a 150 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A58 if…
you care most about performance and value for money.
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro if…
you care most about battery & charging and memory & storage.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A58 | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 169,999 Cheaper | PKR 194,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | March 15, 2027 (Expected) | December 31, 2026 (Expected) |
| Dimensions | 161.5 × 76.8 × 6.9 mm | 157.5 x 75.3 x 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 179 g Better | 218 g |
| Water resistance | IP68, dust-tight and water-resistant up to 1.5 m for 30 minutes | IP68 / IP69 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7-inch Better | 6.59 Inches |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2340 pixels | 1156 x 2510 Pixels Better |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz HDR10+ | AMOLED, Capacitive Touchscreen 185Hz HDR10+ / HDR Vivid Dolby Vision 4500 nits |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1680 (4 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, (3 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (1×2.9 GHz Cortex-720 + 4×2.6 GHz Cortex-720 + 3×1.95 GHz Cortex-520) | Octa-Core, 2 x 4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6 x 3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M |
| GPU | Xclipse 550 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating system | Android 16, One UI 9.5 | Android 16, HyperOS 3. |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB LPDDR5X | 12GB Better |
| Internal storage | 256GB Internal Storage, UFS 4.0 | 256GB / 512GB UFS 4.1 Better |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | Triple Camera — 50 MP (Wide, OIS) + 12 MP (Ultrawide) + 5 MP (Macro), LED Flash, HDR, Panorama | 200 MP + 50 MP Telephoto + 8 MP Ultrawide, OIS, PDAF, 2.5x Optical Zoom, LED Flash, HDR, Panorama Better |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP, HDR | 32 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (wide), HDR Better |
| Video recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, Gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, Slow-motion up to 960fps/1920fps, Gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 6000 mAh | Li-Ion (non-removable) 6330 mAh Better |
| Wired charging | 45W Fast Charging, USB Type-C 2.0 | 100W Wired, 50W Wireless, 27W Reverse Wired, 22.5W Reverse Wireless, PD 3.0, QC 3+, 100W PPS Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM, Dual SIM, Dual Standby (DSDS) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM, up to 2 active SIMs simultaneously |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | v6.0, A2DP, LE | 6.0, A2DP, LE, LHDC 5.0, ASHA, MIHC, Auracast |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyro, Proximity, Virtual Proximity Sensing, Under-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor | Fingerprint (under-display, ultrasonic), Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Compass, Color Spectrum Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Samsung Galaxy A58 or Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro?
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 4.8 points. It wins on battery & charging and memory & storage. Samsung Galaxy A58 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Samsung Galaxy A58 and Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro in Pakistan?
Samsung Galaxy A58 is listed at PKR 169,999 and Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro at PKR 194,999. That makes Samsung Galaxy A58 cheaper by PKR 25,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which phone has the better battery, Samsung Galaxy A58 or Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro?
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro leads on battery. Samsung Galaxy A58 carries a 6000 mAh cell and Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro a 6330 mAh cell, with 45W and 100W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Samsung Galaxy A58 or Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro?
Samsung Galaxy A58 is the stronger gaming phone here. Samsung Galaxy A58 runs the Exynos 1680 (4 nm) while Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, (3 nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A58 vs Huawei P60 Pro
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro vs Huawei P60 Pro
Samsung Galaxy A58 vs vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro vs vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy A58 vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max
Samsung Galaxy A58 vs ZTE nubia Neo 5 Max
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro vs ZTE nubia Neo 5 Max
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.