Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung
PKR 439,999
81/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 28 Dec 2025.
The short answer
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G finish within three points of each other on our combined specification score, so neither is a clear winner. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera. The Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 74,999 against PKR 439,999.
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Tecno
PKR 74,999
79/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedToo close to call. These two finish within three points of each other, so the right answer depends on which category matters most to you.
What actually differs
- Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G costs PKR 365,000 less.
- Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra charges 12W faster.
- Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a 136 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if…
you care most about camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage.
Buy the Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G if…
you care most about value for money.
Not enough published data to score: Performance. Those categories are excluded from the overall figure rather than estimated.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 439,999 | PKR 74,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | January 2025 (Global) / February 2025 (Pakistan) | June 2022 |
| Dimensions | 162.3 × 79.0 × 8.6 mm | 166.7 × 74.3 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 233 g | 204.5 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No official IP rating |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 × 3120 pixels (~505 ppi) Better | 1080 × 2460 pixels (FHD+) |
| Panel type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, HDR10+, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz Refresh Rate Up to 500 nits (typical) |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Armor | Not officially specified |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 810 (6nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (2×4.0 GHz Oryon + 6×2.8 GHz) | 2× Cortex-A76 @ 2.4GHz 6× Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Operating system | Android 15 with One UI 7 | Android 12 HIOS 8.6 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12 GB Better | 8GB LPDDR4X |
| Internal storage | 256 GB | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 |
| Card slot | No | No microSD card support |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP wide (OIS) + 50 MP periscope telephoto (5× optical zoom, OIS) + 10 MP telephoto (3× optical zoom, OIS) + 12 MP ultra-wide Better | 64MP (Wide, f/1.6, PDAF, OIS, RGBW sensor) 2MP Macro 2MP Depth Quad-LED Flash HDR Panorama OIS + EIS Video Stabilization Night Portrait |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 16MP HDR, Dual Video Better |
| Video recording | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Non-removable Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45W wired, 15W wireless, 4.5W reverse wireless Better | 33W Flash Charge USB Type-C Charging |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM (IP68 dust/water resistant) | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby (Dual SIM) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Ultrasonic fingerprint (under-display), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer s_pen Yes (integrated) | Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G?
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G finish within a few points of each other, so neither is a clear winner on paper. Pick the one that leads in the category you care about most.
What is the price of Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G in Pakistan?
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is listed at PKR 439,999 and Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G at PKR 74,999. That makes Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G cheaper by PKR 365,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G?
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores higher in our camera assessment. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra uses a 200 MP main sensor against 64 MP on Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G?
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on battery. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra carries a 5000 mAh cell and Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G a 5000 mAh cell, with 45W and 33W wired charging respectively.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.