Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
Samsung
PKR 314,999
83/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 4 Feb 2026.
The short answer
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 83 against 79 on our combined specification score. It leads on camera, display and memory & storage. The Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 74,999 against PKR 314,999.
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Tecno
PKR 74,999
79/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedSamsung Galaxy S26 Plus takes it by 4.4 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G costs PKR 240,000 less.
- Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G packs a 100 mAh larger battery.
- Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus charges 12W faster.
- Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus ships with 256 GB more storage.
- Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G has a 14 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus if…
you care most about camera, display and memory & storage.
Buy the Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G if…
you care most about value for money.
Not enough published data to score: Performance. Those categories are excluded from the overall figure rather than estimated.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus | Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 314,999 | PKR 74,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | 28 Feb 2026 | June 2022 |
| Dimensions | 158.4 × 75.8 × 7.3 mm | 166.7 × 74.3 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 190 g Better | 204.5 g |
| Water resistance | IP68 (dust/water resistant) | No official IP rating |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches Better |
| Resolution | 1440 × 3120 pixels (~510 ppi) Better | 1080 × 2460 pixels (FHD+) |
| Panel type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X 120 Hz, HDR10+ | IPS LCD, 120Hz Refresh Rate Up to 500 nits (typical) |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Not officially specified |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 810 (6nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (2×4.6 GHz + 6×3.62 GHz) | 2× Cortex-A76 @ 2.4GHz 6× Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Operating system | Android 16, OneUI 8.5 | Android 12 HIOS 8.6 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12 GB Better | 8GB LPDDR4X |
| Internal storage | 256/512 GB, UFS 4.x Better | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 |
| Card slot | No | No microSD card support |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP (wide) + 10 MP (telephoto with 3× optical) + 12 MP (ultrawide) | 64MP (Wide, f/1.6, PDAF, OIS, RGBW sensor) 2MP Macro 2MP Depth Quad-LED Flash HDR Panorama OIS + EIS Video Stabilization Night Portrait Better |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 16MP HDR, Dual Video Better |
| Video recording | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Non-removable Li-Ion 4900 mAh | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh Better |
| Wired charging | 45 W wired, PD3.0; 25 W wireless; 4.5 W reverse wireless Better | 33W Flash Charge USB Type-C Charging |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (up to 2 at once) | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby (Dual SIM) |
| Wi-Fi | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth | v5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under-display, ultrasonic) Accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity Barometer | Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus or Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G?
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 4.4 points. It wins on camera, display and memory & storage. Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus and Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G in Pakistan?
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus is listed at PKR 314,999 and Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G at PKR 74,999. That makes Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G cheaper by PKR 240,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus or Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G?
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus scores higher in our camera assessment. Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus uses a 50 MP main sensor against 64 MP on Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.