Sharp Aquos R10
Sharp
PKR 219,999
84/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Sharp Aquos R10 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 25 May 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 88 against 84 on our combined specification score. It leads on camera, battery & charging and value for money. The Sharp Aquos R10 still wins on performance, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max is the cheaper of the two at PKR 174,999 against PKR 219,999.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Redmi
PKR 174,999
88/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max takes it by 3.8 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max costs PKR 45,000 less.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max packs a 4,210 mAh larger battery.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max charges 64W faster.
- Sharp Aquos R10 has a 0.3 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the Sharp Aquos R10 if…
you care most about performance.
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max if…
you care most about camera, battery & charging and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Sharp Aquos R10 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 219,999 | PKR 174,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2025. | Expected in 2026 |
| Dimensions | 156 × 75 × 8.9 mm | 163.4 × 78.3 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 197g Better | Approximately 229.5 g |
| Water resistance | IP65/IP68 water and dust resistance MIL-STD-810G certified | IP68-rated protection; exact Xiaomi test conditions to be confirmed |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5 inches | 6.83 inches Better |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels (396 PPI) | 1280 × 2772 pixels Better |
| Panel type | Pro IGZO OLED 1Hz–240Hz adaptive | AMOLED |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7500 — reported |
| CPU | Octa-core 1x Cortex-X4 4x Cortex-A720 3x Cortex-A520 | Octa-core |
| GPU | Adreno 732 | Mali GPU |
| Operating system | Android 15 with AQUOS UX (Sharp custom UI) | Android 16 HyperOS 3 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 8GB / 12GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB / 512GB UFS 4.0 | 256GB / 512GB UFS |
| Card slot | microSDXC supported Expandable up to 2TB | Dedicated microSDXC Slot |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50.3MP Wide (f/1.9, OIS, Dual Pixel PDAF, 1/1.55" sensor) + 50.3MP Ultra-Wide | Features: Leica tuning, HDR, Panorama, Night Mode, AI Scene Detection, Pro Mode, Better | 50MP + 8MP — reported OIS, PDAF, HDR, Panorama, LED Flash |
| Selfie camera | 50MP Selfie Camera | Features: HDR, Portrait Mode, Beauty Mode, AI enhancement Better | 32MP |
| Video recording | 4K video recording EIS stabilization Slow motion support | Up to 4K — reported |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Lithium-ion (Li-Po, non-removable) 5000mAh | Si/C Li-Ion (Silicon-Carbon) Battery 9210 mAh Non-removable Better |
| Wired charging | 36W wired charging USB Power Delivery 3.0 Bypass charging Battery health optimization | 100W wired fast charging Reverse Charging 22.5W wired Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual standby) | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 Dual-band Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.x | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Under-display fingerprint sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity sensor Compass Ambient light sensor | Fingerprint Sensor Under-display Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Compass Ambient Light Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Sharp Aquos R10 or Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max?
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 3.8 points. It wins on camera, battery & charging and value for money. Sharp Aquos R10 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Sharp Aquos R10 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max in Pakistan?
Sharp Aquos R10 is listed at PKR 219,999 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max at PKR 174,999. That makes Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max cheaper by PKR 45,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Sharp Aquos R10 or Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max?
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max scores higher in our camera assessment. Sharp Aquos R10 uses a 50.3 MP main sensor against 50 MP on Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Sharp Aquos R10 or Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max?
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max leads on battery. Sharp Aquos R10 carries a 5000 mAh cell and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max a 9210 mAh cell, with 36W and 100W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Sharp Aquos R10 or Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max?
Sharp Aquos R10 is the stronger gaming phone here. Sharp Aquos R10 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4nm) while Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7500 — reported.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Sharp Aquos R10 vs Huawei nova 16 SE
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Huawei nova 16 SE
Sharp Aquos R10 vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Sharp Aquos R10 vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
Sharp Aquos R10 vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.