Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Tecno
PKR 74,999
79/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 5 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 92 against 79 on our combined specification score. It leads on camera, battery & charging and display. The Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 74,999 against PKR 179,999.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus
Redmi
PKR 179,999
92/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus takes it by 13.5 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G costs PKR 105,000 less.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus packs a 2,500 mAh larger battery.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus charges 57W faster.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus offers 8 GB more RAM.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus ships with 768 GB more storage.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus has a 136 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus if…
you care most about camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage.
Not enough published data to score: Performance. Those categories are excluded from the overall figure rather than estimated.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 74,999 Cheaper | PKR 179,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | June 2022 | Expected 2026 |
| Dimensions | 166.7 × 74.3 × 8.6 mm | Not listed |
| Weight | 204.5 g | Not listed |
| Water resistance | No official IP rating | IP68 (dust-tight and water-resistant) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8 inches | 6.83 in Better |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2460 pixels (FHD+) | 1220 × 2772 px (approx.) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD, 120Hz Refresh Rate Up to 500 nits (typical) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Protection | Not officially specified | Dragon Crystal |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 810 (6nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| CPU | 2× Cortex-A76 @ 2.4GHz 6× Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz | Octa-core (2.8 GHz) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 810 |
| Operating system | Android 12 HIOS 8.6 | Android 16 (expected) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB LPDDR4X | 12 GB / 16 GB Better |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 | 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB Better |
| Card slot | No microSD card support | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64MP (Wide, f/1.6, PDAF, OIS, RGBW sensor) 2MP Macro 2MP Depth Quad-LED Flash HDR Panorama OIS + EIS Video Stabilization Night Portrait | 200 MP main + 13 MP ultra-wide + 2 MP telephoto/auxiliary Better |
| Selfie camera | 16MP HDR, Dual Video | 32 MP Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30fps | Up to 4K @ 60fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh | Non-removable Li-Ion ~7500 mAh Better |
| Wired charging | 33W Flash Charge USB Type-C Charging | 90W wired fast charge + reverse charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby (Dual SIM) | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Wi-Fi Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Compass | Under-display fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G or Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus?
Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 13.5 points. It wins on camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage. Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus in Pakistan?
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G is listed at PKR 74,999 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus at PKR 179,999. That makes Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G cheaper by PKR 105,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G or Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus?
Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus scores higher in our camera assessment. Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G uses a 64 MP main sensor against 200 MP on Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G or Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus?
Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus leads on battery. Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G carries a 5000 mAh cell and Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus a 7500 mAh cell, with 33W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.