Tecno Camon 19 Pro
Tecno
PKR 49,999
69/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Camon 19 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 5 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 91 against 69 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, battery & charging and display. The Tecno Camon 19 Pro still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Camon 19 Pro is the cheaper of the two at PKR 49,999 against PKR 179,999.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus
Redmi
PKR 179,999
91/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus takes it by 21.7 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Camon 19 Pro costs PKR 130,000 less.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus packs a 2,500 mAh larger battery.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus charges 57W faster.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus offers 8 GB more RAM.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus ships with 896 GB more storage.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus has a 136 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Camon 19 Pro if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus if…
you care most about performance, battery & charging, display and memory & storage.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 19 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 49,999 Cheaper | PKR 179,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2022 | Expected 2026 |
| Dimensions | 166.8 × 74.6 × 8.6 mm | Not listed |
| Weight | Approx. 204 g | Not listed |
| Water resistance | No official IP certification | IP68 (dust-tight and water-resistant) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8 inches | 6.83 in Better |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2460 pixels (FHD+) | 1220 × 2772 px (approx.) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD 120Hz 16.7 million colors Adaptive refresh rate Multi-touch support Excellent viewing angles Smooth scrolling and gaming experience | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Protection | Not officially specified | Dragon Crystal |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A76 @ 2.05 GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz | Octa-core (2.8 GHz) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 810 |
| Operating system | Android 12 with HIOS 8.6 | Android 16 (expected) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB | 12 GB / 16 GB Better |
| Internal storage | 128GB UFS 2.2 | 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB Better |
| Card slot | microSDXC (Dedicated Slot) | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP, f/1.8, Wide, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, Telephoto, PDAF, 2x Optical Zoom 2 MP, Depth Sensor Quad-LED Flash HDR Panorama Portrait Mode AI Scene Detection Night Mode | 200 MP main + 13 MP ultra-wide + 2 MP telephoto/auxiliary Better |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP Wide Camera Dual-LED Flash HDR | 32 MP |
| Video recording | 1080p @ 30fps | Up to 4K @ 60fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh | Non-removable Li-Ion ~7500 mAh Better |
| Wired charging | 33W Fast Charging 100% in approximately 65 minutes (advertised) | 90W wired fast charge + reverse charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Scanner Accelerometer Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor | Under-display fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Camon 19 Pro or Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus?
Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 21.7 points. It wins on performance, battery & charging, display and memory & storage. Tecno Camon 19 Pro can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Camon 19 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus in Pakistan?
Tecno Camon 19 Pro is listed at PKR 49,999 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus at PKR 179,999. That makes Tecno Camon 19 Pro cheaper by PKR 130,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Camon 19 Pro or Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus?
Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus leads on battery. Tecno Camon 19 Pro carries a 5000 mAh cell and Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus a 7500 mAh cell, with 33W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Camon 19 Pro or Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus?
Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Camon 19 Pro runs the MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm) while Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Camon 19 Pro vs Tecno Spark 40 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus vs Tecno Spark 40 5G
Tecno Camon 19 Pro vs Tecno Spark 30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus vs Tecno Spark 30 5G
Tecno Camon 19 Pro vs TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition
Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus vs TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition
Tecno Camon 19 Pro vs Tecno Camon 19 Neo
Xiaomi Redmi Note 16 Pro Plus vs Tecno Camon 19 Neo
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.