Tecno Camon 30 5G
Tecno
PKR 69,999
83/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Vivo Y400
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 5 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Tecno Camon 30 5G is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 83 against 75 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and memory & storage. The Vivo Y400 still wins on battery & charging, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Vivo Y400 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 64,999 against PKR 69,999.
Vivo Y400
Vivo
PKR 64,999
75/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedTecno Camon 30 5G takes it by 8.2 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Vivo Y400 costs PKR 5,000 less.
- Vivo Y400 packs a 1,000 mAh larger battery.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G charges 26W faster.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G ships with 256 GB more storage.
Buy the Tecno Camon 30 5G if…
you care most about performance, camera, memory & storage and value for money.
Buy the Vivo Y400 if…
you care most about battery & charging.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 30 5G | Vivo Y400 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 69,999 | PKR 64,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 2024 | 2 September 2025 (Pakistan launch) |
| Dimensions | Glass Back: 165.4 × 75.9 × 7.8 mm Eco Leather: 165.4 × 75.9 × 8.0 mm | 162.3 × 75.3 × 7.9 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 196–198 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP53 (Dust protected & splash resistant) | IP68 + IP69 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2436 pixels (FHD+) Better | 1080 × 2400 pixels (~395 ppi) |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120Hz | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ (up to 1800 nits peak) |
| Protection | Basic reinforced glass (manufacturer not disclosed) | Glass (unspecified), premium AMOLED durability |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A78 @ 2.2GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz | Octa-core (4×2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4×1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 610 |
| Operating system | Android 14 HIOS 14 | Android 15 with Funtouch OS 15 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB LPDDR4X (Memory Fusion (Extended RAM) supported) Better | 8 GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB / 512GB UFS 2.2 Better | 256 GB (UFS 2.2) |
| Card slot | microSDXC (availability varies by market) | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP f/1.9 aperture PDAF Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) Secondary 2 MP Depth Sensor Auxiliary Light Sensor Dual LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Camera Portrait Mode Night Mode | 50 MP main (Sony sensor) + 2 MP depth |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP Autofocus (AF) Dual Color Temperature Flash Better | 8 MP wide |
| Video recording | 1440p @30fps 1080p @30/60fps | 1080p@30fps (rear & front) |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh | Non-removable Li-ion ~6000 mAh Better |
| Wired charging | 70W Ultra Charge (Wired) 0–50%: Approximately 19 minutes 0–100%: Approximately 45–50 minutes (under optimal conditions) Better | 44W wired, reverse wired |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual Nano-SIM (IP68 & IP69 water/dust resistant) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Direct Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 A2DP LE | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | In-display Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Electronic Compass Infrared Remote Sensor | Fingerprint (under-display, optical), accelerometer, gyroscope, compass, proximity |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Camon 30 5G or Vivo Y400?
Tecno Camon 30 5G comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 8.2 points. It wins on performance, camera, memory & storage and value for money. Vivo Y400 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Camon 30 5G and Vivo Y400 in Pakistan?
Tecno Camon 30 5G is listed at PKR 69,999 and Vivo Y400 at PKR 64,999. That makes Vivo Y400 cheaper by PKR 5,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Camon 30 5G or Vivo Y400?
Tecno Camon 30 5G scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Camon 30 5G or Vivo Y400?
Vivo Y400 leads on battery. Tecno Camon 30 5G carries a 5000 mAh cell and Vivo Y400 a 6000 mAh cell, with 70W and 44W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Camon 30 5G or Vivo Y400?
Tecno Camon 30 5G is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Camon 30 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm) while Vivo Y400 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6 nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Vivo Y400 vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Vivo Y400 vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Vivo Y400 vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Vivo Y400 vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.