Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno
PKR 65,999
81/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G vs Vivo Y29
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 5 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 81 against 67 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Vivo Y29 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 60,999 against PKR 65,999.
Vivo Y29
Vivo
PKR 60,999
67/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedTecno Camon 40 Pro 4G takes it by 13.3 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Vivo Y29 costs PKR 5,000 less.
- Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G packs a 200 mAh larger battery.
- Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G charges 30W faster.
- Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G offers 8 GB more RAM.
- Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging, display, memory & storage and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G | Vivo Y29 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 65,999 | PKR 60,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 2025 | December 2024 (Asia rollout) ,Pakistan: Early 2025 |
| Dimensions | 164.4 × 74.3 × 7.3 mm | 165.7 × 76.0 × 8.1 mm |
| Weight | 178 g Better | 198 g |
| Water resistance | IP68/IP69 dust and water resistant (up to 2m for 30 minutes, high-pressure water jets) | No IP rating |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.68 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2436 pixels (FHD+) Better | 720 × 1608 pixels (~264 ppi) |
| Panel type | AMOLED, 120Hz, Always-On Display Curved AMOLED display 120Hz adaptive refresh rate Always-On Display Multi-touch support Up to 1300 nits peak brightness 10-bit color support Eye-care mode | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Standard hardened glass |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate (6nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) |
| CPU | 2 × Cortex-A76 @ 2.2GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz | Octa-core • 2×2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 • 6×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Operating system | Android 15 with HiOS 15 | Android 14 (Funtouch OS 14) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB LPDDR4X (Up to 8GB Virtual RAM (16GB total memory) Better | 8 GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS | 256 GB |
| Card slot | Dedicated microSDXC Slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP f/1.9 Aperture 23mm Wide Lens 1/1.56" Sensor PDAF Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) Secondary Camera 8MP Ultra-Wide Dual LED Flash HDR Panorama Flicker Sensor AI Photography Night Mode Portrait Mode Super Night AI Eraser AI Image Expansion | 50 MP (wide) 2 MP (depth) |
| Selfie camera | 50MP Autofocus (AF) f/2.5 PDAF HDR AI Beauty Better | 8 MP |
| Video recording | 4K @30fps 4K HDR @60fps (market dependent) 1080p Recording Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) | 1080p @ 30fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5200 mAh Better | Non-removable Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45W Flash Charge 50% Charge: About 23 Minutes 100% Charge: About 43 Minutes AI Smart Charging Long-life Battery (Rated for approximately 1,800 charging cycles) Better | 15W wired |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-Band Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 A2DP LE | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Sensors | Under-display Optical Fingerprint Face Unlock Accelerometer Gyroscope Compass Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Geomagnetic Sensor Electronic Compass Infrared Remote Sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint Accelerometer Proximity Compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G or Vivo Y29?
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 13.3 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging, display, memory & storage and value for money. Vivo Y29 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G and Vivo Y29 in Pakistan?
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G is listed at PKR 65,999 and Vivo Y29 at PKR 60,999. That makes Vivo Y29 cheaper by PKR 5,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G or Vivo Y29?
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G or Vivo Y29?
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G leads on battery. Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G carries a 5200 mAh cell and Vivo Y29 a 5000 mAh cell, with 45W and 15W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G or Vivo Y29?
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G runs the MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate (6nm) while Vivo Y29 runs the MediaTek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Vivo Y29 vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Vivo Y29 vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G vs Honor X6e
Vivo Y29 vs Honor X6e
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Vivo Y29 vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.