Tecno Camon Air
Tecno
PKR 120,999
74/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Camon Air vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 7 Sep 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 93 against 74 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Tecno Camon Air still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Camon Air is the cheaper of the two at PKR 120,999 against PKR 252,999.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Poco
PKR 252,999
93/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi Poco F7 Ultra takes it by 18.9 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Camon Air costs PKR 132,000 less.
- Tecno Camon Air packs a 700 mAh larger battery.
- Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra charges 75W faster.
- Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra offers 8 GB more RAM.
- Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra ships with 256 GB more storage.
Buy the Tecno Camon Air if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging and memory & storage.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon Air | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 120,999 Cheaper | PKR 252,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | September 2, 2026 | March 27, 2025 |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 77.7 x 6.4 mm | 160.3 × 75.0 × 8.4 mm |
| Weight | 167 g Better | 212 g |
| Water resistance | IP68/IP69 dust and water resistance | IP68 Dust & Water Resistance Dust-tight protection Water-resistant up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes (manufacturer-rated) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.67 Inches |
| Resolution | 1224 × 2720 pixels | 1440 × 3200 Pixels (WQHD+) Better |
| Panel type | AMOLED 144Hz Always-on display, 2160Hz PWM dimming | Flow AMOLED 120Hz HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 68 Billion Colors, Always-On Display |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | POCO Shield Glass |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (2 × 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6 × 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-Core Processor 2 × Oryon V2 Phoenix L @ 4.32 GHz 6 × Oryon V2 Phoenix M @ 3.53 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 830 |
| Operating system | Android 16 HiOS 16.3 | Android 15 (HyperOS 2) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB LPDDR5X Better |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB UFS 4.1 Better |
| Card slot | No | No microSD card slot |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP, f/1.8, PDAF, LED flash | 50 MP Wide, OIS 50 MP Telephoto, OIS, 2.5x Optical Zoom 32 MP Ultra-Wide, 120° FOV Panorama Night Mode Motion Tracking Focus Pro Mode |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP, f/2.5, wide-angle lens | 32 MP Selfie Camera HDR |
| Video recording | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@30fps | 8K@24fps 4K@60fps 1080p@240fps 720p@1920fps Slow Motion |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 6000 mAh Better | 5300mAh Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Ion Battery (Non-removable) |
| Wired charging | 45W wired fast charging | 120W HyperCharge Wired Charging 50W Wireless HyperCharge Reverse Wireless Charging Support Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 7 Wi-Fi 6E Dual-Band Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 6.0 aptX HD aptX Adaptive aptX Lossless LHDC 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass, Fingerprint (under-display) | Ultrasonic In-Display Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Compass Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Flicker Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 OTG Support |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Camon Air or Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra?
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 18.9 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging and memory & storage. Tecno Camon Air can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Camon Air and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra in Pakistan?
Tecno Camon Air is listed at PKR 120,999 and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra at PKR 252,999. That makes Tecno Camon Air cheaper by PKR 132,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Camon Air or Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra?
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Camon Air or Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra?
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra leads on battery. Tecno Camon Air carries a 6000 mAh cell and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra a 5300 mAh cell, with 45W and 120W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Camon Air or Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra?
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Camon Air runs the MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate while Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Camon Air vs Vivo Y600
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Vivo Y600
Tecno Camon Air vs Honor X9e Pro
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Honor X9e Pro
Tecno Camon Air vs TECNO POVA 8 Pro 5G Tonino Lamborghini Limited Edition
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs TECNO POVA 8 Pro 5G Tonino Lamborghini Limited Edition
Tecno Camon Air vs vivo V80 Lite
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs vivo V80 Lite
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.