TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition
Tecno
PKR 47,999
70/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition vs Vivo Y50s
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 4 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Vivo Y50s is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 73 against 70 on our combined specification score. It leads on camera and value for money. The TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition still wins on battery & charging and memory & storage, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Vivo Y50s is the cheaper of the two at PKR 44,999 against PKR 47,999.
Vivo Y50s
Vivo
PKR 44,999
73/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedVivo Y50s takes it by 3.7 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Vivo Y50s costs PKR 3,000 less.
- TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition charges 50W faster.
- TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition ships with 128 GB more storage.
- TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition has a 37 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition if…
you care most about battery & charging and memory & storage.
Buy the Vivo Y50s if…
you care most about camera and value for money.
Not enough published data to score: Performance. Those categories are excluded from the overall figure rather than estimated.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition | Vivo Y50s |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 47,999 | PKR 44,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | August 2023 | January 5, 2026. |
| Dimensions | 168.5 × 76.5 × 9.0 mm | 162.0 x 76.6 x 9.1 mm |
| Weight | Approximately 220 g | 197 g Better |
| Water resistance | No official IP rating | IP64 rating |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78-inch Better | 6.53 inches |
| Resolution | FHD+ (1080 × 2460 pixels), ~396 PPI Better | 1080 x 2340 pixels (~395 ppi) |
| Panel type | IPS LCD, 120Hz Refresh Rate | IPS LCD |
| Protection | Not officially specified | Not specified |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (6nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A76 @ 2.4GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold + 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| Operating system | Android 13, HiOS 13 | Android 10 Funtouch OS 10.5 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB LPDDR4X (Up to 8GB Extended RAM) | 8 GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 2.2 Better | 128 GB |
| Card slot | Dedicated microSDXC Slot | Yes, microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP, Wide, f/1.6, PDAF (Primary) 0.08 MP, AI Auxiliary Lens Dual LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Camera Super Night Mode Portrait Mode Time-Lapse Slow Motion AR Mode Document Mode Beauty Mode Pro Mode Better | 13 MP (wide) + 8 MP (ultrawide) + 2 MP (macro) + 2 MP (depth) |
| Selfie camera | 16MP Dual LED Flash AI Beauty Portrait Mode | 16 MP (wide) |
| Video recording | 1440p (2K) @ 30fps 1080p (Full HD) @ 30fps 720p (HD) @ 30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh | Non-removable Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68W Ultra Charge (Wired), Reverse Wired Charging, Bypass Charging Better | 18W fast charging |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual standby) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-Band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Electronic Compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition or Vivo Y50s?
Vivo Y50s comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 3.7 points. It wins on camera and value for money. TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition and Vivo Y50s in Pakistan?
TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition is listed at PKR 47,999 and Vivo Y50s at PKR 44,999. That makes Vivo Y50s cheaper by PKR 3,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition or Vivo Y50s?
Vivo Y50s scores higher in our camera assessment. TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition uses a 50 MP main sensor against 13 MP on Vivo Y50s, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition or Vivo Y50s?
TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition leads on battery. TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition carries a 5000 mAh cell and Vivo Y50s a 5000 mAh cell, with 68W and 18W wired charging respectively.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition vs Tecno Camon 19 Neo
Vivo Y50s vs Tecno Camon 19 Neo
TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition vs Tecno Spark 40 5G
Vivo Y50s vs Tecno Spark 40 5G
TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition vs TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition
Vivo Y50s vs TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition
TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition vs Tecno Spark 30 5G
Vivo Y50s vs Tecno Spark 30 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.