TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Tecno
PKR 64,999
80/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition vs Vivo V60 Lite
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 4 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 80 against 77 on our combined specification score. It leads on camera, memory & storage and value for money. The Vivo V60 Lite still wins on battery & charging, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition is the cheaper of the two at PKR 64,999 against PKR 76,999.
Vivo V60 Lite
Vivo
PKR 76,999
77/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedTECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition takes it by 3.2 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition costs PKR 12,000 less.
- Vivo V60 Lite packs a 500 mAh larger battery.
- Vivo V60 Lite charges 20W faster.
- TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition offers 4 GB more RAM.
- TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition has a 58 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition if…
you care most about camera, memory & storage and value for money.
Buy the Vivo V60 Lite if…
you care most about battery & charging.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition | Vivo V60 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 64,999 Cheaper | PKR 76,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | March 2024 Free Fire Edition released in selected markets during 2024 | Not listed |
| Dimensions | 166.2 × 76.8 × 7.9 mm | 163.77 × 76.28 × 7.59 mm |
| Weight | Approximately 195 g | 194 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP53 Dust protected (limited dust ingress) Protected against water splashes from any direction | Not listed |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.77 in |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2436 pixels (Full HD+) Better | 1080 × 2392 pixels (~388 ppi) |
| Panel type | AMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate Up to 1,300 nits TÜV Rheinland Low Blue Light certification, Dynamic Port, adaptive refresh rate (up to 120Hz). | AMOLED capacitive touchscreen, 1B colors |
| Protection | Panda Glass protection (market dependent) | Not listed |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate (6nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz | Octa-core (4×2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4×1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| Operating system | Android 14 (HiOS 14) | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB LPDDR4X (Supports Memory Fusion (up to 12GB extended RAM, depending on variant) Better | 8 GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 2.2 | 256 GB |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP main camera AI depth/light sensor Dual LED Flash Better | 50 MP wide (f/1.8) + 8 MP ultra-wide (f/2.2) |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP selfie camera Dual LED Flash | 32 MP wide |
| Video recording | 2K at 30fps 1080p at 60fps 1080p at 30fps | 1080 p@30fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 6000 mAh | Li-ion Si-Ca 6500 mAh Better |
| Wired charging | 70W Fast Charging, Bypass Charging, Reverse Wired Charging | 90W wired; 6W reverse wired Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual Nano-SIM (Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | v5.3 | v5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Sensors | In-display fingerprint sensor Face Unlock Accelerometer Gyroscope (virtual/software-assisted) Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor Electronic Compass | Accelerometer, Gyro, Compass, Proximity, Fingerprint |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition or Vivo V60 Lite?
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 3.2 points. It wins on camera, memory & storage and value for money. Vivo V60 Lite can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition and Vivo V60 Lite in Pakistan?
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition is listed at PKR 64,999 and Vivo V60 Lite at PKR 76,999. That makes TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition cheaper by PKR 12,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition or Vivo V60 Lite?
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition scores higher in our camera assessment. TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition uses a 108 MP main sensor against 50 MP on Vivo V60 Lite, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition or Vivo V60 Lite?
Vivo V60 Lite leads on battery. TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition carries a 6000 mAh cell and Vivo V60 Lite a 6500 mAh cell, with 70W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Vivo V60 Lite vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Vivo V60 Lite vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Vivo V60 Lite vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Vivo V60 Lite vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.