Tecno Pova Neo
Tecno
PKR 36,999
69/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 4 Aug 2026.
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 90 against 69 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Tecno Pova Neo still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Pova Neo is the cheaper of the two at PKR 36,999 against PKR 239,999.
Tecno
PKR 36,999
69/100 overall
Full specs & reviewXiaomi
PKR 239,999
90/100 overall
Full specs & reviewUp to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max takes it by 21.1 points on our weighted spec score.
you care most about value for money.
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage.
| Specification | Tecno Pova Neo | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 36,999 Cheaper | PKR 239,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | December 2021 | Expected September 2025 (Pakistan / global) |
| Dimensions | 171.4 × 77.3 × 9.1 mm | 162.9 × 77.6 × 8.0 mm |
| Weight | Not officially specified | 219 g |
| Water resistance | No official IP rating | Not listed |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8 inches | 6.9 in Better |
| Resolution | 720 × 1640 pixels (HD+) | 1200 × 2608 pixels (~416 ppi) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD 120Hz Up to 480 nits | LTPO AMOLED, HDR10+, 120Hz |
| Protection | No official protection specified | Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass / Shield Glass 3.0 (leaked) |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G25 (12nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) |
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2 × 4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6 × 3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating system | Android 11 HIOS 7.6 | HyperOS 3 (based on Android 16) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12 / 16 GB LPDDR5X (variants) Better |
| Internal storage | 64GB / 128GB | 512 GB / 1 TB UFS 4.1 (variants) Better |
| Card slot | Dedicated microSDXC slot (expandable storage) | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP (Wide), Autofocus AI Secondary Lens Quad-LED Flash HDR Panorama Face Detection | 50 MP (wide, OIS) + 50 MP periscope telephoto (5× optical zoom) + 50 MP ultra-wide Better |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP Dual LED Flash HDR | 50 MP wide Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps (HDR) + 4K@30/60/120fps + 1080p up to 960fps (various modes) |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 6000 mAh | Non-removable Li-ion / Si-C ~7,500 mAh Better |
| Wired charging | 18W Fast Charging | 100W wired, 50W wireless, ~22.5W reverse wireless Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM (IP68, dust/water resistant) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Wi-Fi Direct Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Sensors | Rear-mounted Fingerprint Scanner Accelerometer Proximity Sensor Compass | Fingerprint (under-display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 21.1 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage. Tecno Pova Neo can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
Tecno Pova Neo is listed at PKR 36,999 and Xiaomi 17 Pro Max at PKR 239,999. That makes Tecno Pova Neo cheaper by PKR 203,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max scores higher in our camera assessment. Tecno Pova Neo uses a 13 MP main sensor against 50 MP on Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on battery. Tecno Pova Neo carries a 6000 mAh cell and Xiaomi 17 Pro Max a 7500 mAh cell, with 18W and 100W wired charging respectively.
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Pova Neo runs the MediaTek Helio G25 (12nm) while Xiaomi 17 Pro Max runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm).
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.