Tecno Pova Neo
Tecno
PKR 36,999
64/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 4 Aug 2026.
The ZTE Blade A35e is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 68 against 64 on our combined specification score. It leads on value for money. The Tecno Pova Neo still wins on battery & charging and memory & storage, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The ZTE Blade A35e is the cheaper of the two at PKR 15,999 against PKR 36,999.
Tecno
PKR 36,999
64/100 overall
Full specs & reviewZTE Mobile
PKR 15,999
68/100 overall
Full specs & reviewUp to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
ZTE Blade A35e takes it by 4.3 points on our weighted spec score.
you care most about battery & charging and memory & storage.
you care most about value for money.
Not enough published data to score: Performance. Those categories are excluded from the overall figure rather than estimated.
| Specification | Tecno Pova Neo | ZTE Blade A35e |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 36,999 | PKR 15,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | December 2021 | 2025, September (launched in Pakistan October 2025) |
| Dimensions | 171.4 × 77.3 × 9.1 mm | 167.6 × 77.4 × 8.3–8.5 mm |
| Weight | Not officially specified | 181–190 g |
| Water resistance | No official IP rating | No official IP rating |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8 inches Better | 6.52 inches |
| Resolution | 720 × 1640 pixels (HD+) Better | 576 × 1280 pixels (HD+) |
| Panel type | IPS LCD 120Hz Up to 480 nits | IPS LCD |
| Protection | No official protection specified | Not listed |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G25 (12nm) | Unisoc SC9863A |
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | IMG8322 |
| Operating system | Android 11 HIOS 7.6 | Android 14 (Go Edition) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB Better | 2 GB (+4 GB extended) |
| Internal storage | 64GB / 128GB Better | 64 GB |
| Card slot | Dedicated microSDXC slot (expandable storage) | microSD (up to 1 TB) |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP (Wide), Autofocus AI Secondary Lens Quad-LED Flash HDR Panorama Face Detection Better | 8 MP Dual Camera with AI + LED flash |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP Dual LED Flash HDR Better | 5 MP |
| Video recording | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 6000 mAh Better | Non-removable Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 18W Fast Charging Better | 10W |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Wi-Fi Direct Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| Sensors | Rear-mounted Fingerprint Scanner Accelerometer Proximity Sensor Compass | Accelerometer Compass Proximity (Fingerprint unclear or side mounted optional |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
ZTE Blade A35e comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 4.3 points. It wins on value for money. Tecno Pova Neo can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
Tecno Pova Neo is listed at PKR 36,999 and ZTE Blade A35e at PKR 15,999. That makes ZTE Blade A35e cheaper by PKR 21,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Tecno Pova Neo leads on battery. Tecno Pova Neo carries a 6000 mAh cell and ZTE Blade A35e a 5000 mAh cell, with 18W and 10W wired charging respectively.
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.