Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G
Tecno
PKR 52,999
73/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G vs Vivo X300 Ultra
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 10 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Vivo X300 Ultra is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 92 against 73 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 52,999 against PKR 253,999.
Vivo X300 Ultra
Vivo
PKR 253,999
92/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedVivo X300 Ultra takes it by 18.9 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G costs PKR 201,000 less.
- Vivo X300 Ultra packs a 1,510 mAh larger battery.
- Vivo X300 Ultra charges 87W faster.
- Vivo X300 Ultra offers 8 GB more RAM.
- Vivo X300 Ultra ships with 768 GB more storage.
- Vivo X300 Ultra has a 92 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Vivo X300 Ultra uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the Vivo X300 Ultra if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 52,999 Cheaper | PKR 253,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | June 2024 | April 30, 2026 (expected in Pakistan) |
| Dimensions | 168.5 × 76.2 × 8.3 mm (Plastic Back) 168.5 × 76.2 × 8.5 mm (Vegan Leather) | 164.3 × 76.4 × 8.5 mm |
| Weight | 200 g Better | 228 g |
| Water resistance | No confirmed IP rating | IP68/IP69 dust and water resistance. |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches | 6.8 inches Better |
| Resolution | Full HD+ resolution (1080 × 2460 pixels) | 1260 × 2800 pixels (~452 ppi) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD 120Hz refresh rate | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Protection | Not Specified | Not officially specified |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (6nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 5) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A76 @ 2.4GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz | Octa-core (up to 4.6 GHz) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating system | Android 14, HIOS 14 | Android 16 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8 GB (Up to 8 GB Virtual RAM) | 12 GB / 16 GB Better |
| Internal storage | 256 GB | 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB (UFS 4.1) Better |
| Card slot | Dedicated microSDXC Slot | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP main camera 2 MP macro camera Dual LED flash HDR Panorama Autofocus | 200 MP (wide, OIS) + 50 MP periscope telephoto (OIS, 3× optical zoom) + 50 MP ultra-wide Better |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP Dual-color temperature flash HDR | 50 MP wide Better |
| Video recording | 1440p@30fps 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh | Non-removable Li-Ion 6510 mAh (Si-C battery) Better |
| Wired charging | 33W Super Charge | 120W wired, 50W wireless, 10W reverse charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (market dependent) | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM (IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor Accelerometer Proximity sensor Ambient light sensor Electronic compass | Ultrasonic under-display fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G or Vivo X300 Ultra?
Vivo X300 Ultra comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 18.9 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage. Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G and Vivo X300 Ultra in Pakistan?
Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G is listed at PKR 52,999 and Vivo X300 Ultra at PKR 253,999. That makes Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G cheaper by PKR 201,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G or Vivo X300 Ultra?
Vivo X300 Ultra scores higher in our camera assessment. Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G uses a 108 MP main sensor against 200 MP on Vivo X300 Ultra, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G or Vivo X300 Ultra?
Vivo X300 Ultra leads on battery. Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G carries a 5000 mAh cell and Vivo X300 Ultra a 6510 mAh cell, with 33W and 120W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G or Vivo X300 Ultra?
Vivo X300 Ultra is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (6nm) while Vivo X300 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 5).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G vs Tecno Spark 40 5G
Vivo X300 Ultra vs Tecno Spark 40 5G
Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G vs Tecno Spark 30 5G
Vivo X300 Ultra vs Tecno Spark 30 5G
Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro
Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G vs TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition
Vivo X300 Ultra vs TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.