Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G
Tecno
PKR 52,999
73/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Poco F6
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 10 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi Poco F6 is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 86 against 73 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 52,999 against PKR 124,999.
Xiaomi Poco F6
Poco
PKR 124,999
86/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi Poco F6 takes it by 13.2 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G costs PKR 72,000 less.
- Xiaomi Poco F6 charges 57W faster.
- Xiaomi Poco F6 offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Xiaomi Poco F6 ships with 256 GB more storage.
- Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G has a 58 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Xiaomi Poco F6 uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F6 if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G | Xiaomi Poco F6 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 52,999 Cheaper | PKR 124,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | June 2024 | 23 May 2024 |
| Dimensions | 168.5 × 76.2 × 8.3 mm (Plastic Back) 168.5 × 76.2 × 8.5 mm (Vegan Leather) | 160.5 × 74.4 × 7.8 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 179 g Better |
| Water resistance | No confirmed IP rating | IP64 dust and splash resistant |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.67 Inches |
| Resolution | Full HD+ resolution (1080 × 2460 pixels) | 1220 x 2712 Pixels (~446 PPI) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD 120Hz refresh rate | AMOLED, 68 Billion Colors, 120Hz Refresh Rate HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 2400 nits Peak Brightness, 2160Hz Instant Touch Sampling Rate |
| Protection | Not Specified | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (6nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A76 @ 2.4GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz | Octa-core (1× Cortex-X4 3.0GHz, 4× Cortex-A720 2.8GHz, 3× Cortex-A520 2.0GHz) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 735 |
| Operating system | Android 14, HIOS 14 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8 GB (Up to 8 GB Virtual RAM) | 8GB / 12GB LPDDR5X Better |
| Internal storage | 256 GB | 256GB / 512GB UFS 4.0 Better |
| Card slot | Dedicated microSDXC Slot | No microSD support |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP main camera 2 MP macro camera Dual LED flash HDR Panorama Autofocus Better | 50MP Sony IMX882 (OIS) 8MP Ultra-Wide |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP Dual-color temperature flash HDR | 20MP Selfie Camera Better |
| Video recording | 1440p@30fps 1080p@30fps | 4K video recording at 60fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh | Li-Po (non-removable) 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 33W Super Charge | 90W Wired Turbo Charging 100% Charge in approximately 35 minutes USB Type-C Charging Port Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (market dependent) | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | v5.4 with A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor Accelerometer Proximity sensor Ambient light sensor Electronic compass | In-display Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Compass Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor X-axis Linear Motor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G or Xiaomi Poco F6?
Xiaomi Poco F6 comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 13.2 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage. Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G and Xiaomi Poco F6 in Pakistan?
Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G is listed at PKR 52,999 and Xiaomi Poco F6 at PKR 124,999. That makes Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G cheaper by PKR 72,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G or Xiaomi Poco F6?
Xiaomi Poco F6 scores higher in our camera assessment. Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G uses a 108 MP main sensor against 50 MP on Xiaomi Poco F6, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G or Xiaomi Poco F6?
Xiaomi Poco F6 leads on battery. Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G carries a 5000 mAh cell and Xiaomi Poco F6 a 5000 mAh cell, with 33W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G or Xiaomi Poco F6?
Xiaomi Poco F6 is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (6nm) while Xiaomi Poco F6 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G vs OnePlus N6x
Xiaomi Poco F6 vs OnePlus N6x
Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G vs Tecno Spark 40 5G
Xiaomi Poco F6 vs Tecno Spark 40 5G
Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G vs Tecno Spark 30 5G
Xiaomi Poco F6 vs Tecno Spark 30 5G
Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro
Xiaomi Poco F6 vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.