Tecno Spark 30 5G
Tecno
PKR 49,999
64/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Spark 30 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 5 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 83 against 64 on our combined specification score. It leads on camera, battery & charging and display. The Tecno Spark 30 5G still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Spark 30 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 49,999 against PKR 75,999.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17
Redmi
PKR 75,999
83/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi Redmi Note 17 takes it by 19 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Spark 30 5G costs PKR 26,000 less.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 charges 49W faster.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 has a 92 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Spark 30 5G if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 if…
you care most about camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage.
Not enough published data to score: Performance. Those categories are excluded from the overall figure rather than estimated.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 30 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 49,999 Cheaper | PKR 75,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | September 2024 | in China between July and December 2026 |
| Dimensions | 165 x 77 x 7.8 mm | Not listed |
| Weight | 188.5 g | Not listed |
| Water resistance | IP54 dust and splash resistant | IP64 splash resistance expected |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.67 inches | 6.77 inches Better |
| Resolution | 720 × 1600 pixels (HD+) | 1220 x 2712 pixels (rumored) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD 120Hz Up to 700 nits (High Brightness Mode) | AMOLED, 120Hz |
| Protection | No official display protection announced | Gorilla Glass |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) | MediaTek Dimensity series |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A76 2.4 GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 2.0 GHz | Octa-core |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-GPU |
| Operating system | Android 14 with HiOS 14 | Android 16 with HyperOS |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB Supported (Memory Fusion technology, up to 8GB extended RAM depending on the variant) | 8GB / 12GB Better |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 | 128GB / 256GB |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (possibly shared SIM slot) |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP, f/1.8, PDAF Auxiliary sensor Triple LED Flash HDR Panorama | Triple Camera Setup 50MP / 200MP main sensor expected Features: LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Camera Features Better |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP Dual-LED Flash | 16MP / 32MP Better |
| Video recording | 1080p at 30fps | 4K@30fps 1080p@30/60fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 5000mAh–7000mAh expected |
| Wired charging | 18W Wired Fast Charging | 67W / 90W / 100W fast charging (variant dependent) Reverse charging support Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby (Dual SIM) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual standby) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 A2DP LE | v5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Proximity Sensor Compass Ambient Light Sensor Virtual Gyroscope | Fingerprint: Under-display optical Accelerometer Gyroscope Compass Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Spark 30 5G or Xiaomi Redmi Note 17?
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 19 points. It wins on camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage. Tecno Spark 30 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Spark 30 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 in Pakistan?
Tecno Spark 30 5G is listed at PKR 49,999 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 at PKR 75,999. That makes Tecno Spark 30 5G cheaper by PKR 26,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Spark 30 5G or Xiaomi Redmi Note 17?
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 scores higher in our camera assessment. Tecno Spark 30 5G uses a 108 MP main sensor against 200 MP on Xiaomi Redmi Note 17, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Spark 30 5G or Xiaomi Redmi Note 17?
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 leads on battery. Tecno Spark 30 5G carries a 5000 mAh cell and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 a 5000 mAh cell, with 18W and 67W wired charging respectively.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Spark 30 5G vs Tecno Spark 40 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 vs Tecno Spark 40 5G
Tecno Spark 30 5G vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro
Tecno Spark 30 5G vs TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 vs TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition
Tecno Spark 30 5G vs Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 vs Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.