TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition
Tecno
PKR 45,999
64/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition vs Vivo Y600 Pro
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Vivo Y600 Pro is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 78 against 64 on our combined specification score. It leads on camera, battery & charging and display. The TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition is the cheaper of the two at PKR 45,999 against PKR 97,999.
Vivo Y600 Pro
Vivo
PKR 97,999
78/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedVivo Y600 Pro takes it by 13.2 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition costs PKR 52,000 less.
- Vivo Y600 Pro charges 26W faster.
- Vivo Y600 Pro offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Vivo Y600 Pro uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the Vivo Y600 Pro if…
you care most about camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage.
Not enough published data to score: Performance. Those categories are excluded from the overall figure rather than estimated.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition | Vivo Y600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 45,999 Cheaper | PKR 97,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | October 2024 | April 2026 |
| Dimensions | 168 × 76.4 × 7.7 mm | Not listed |
| Weight | 190 g | Not listed |
| Water resistance | IP64 Dust and Splash Resistant | No confirmed protection |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.67 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2460 pixels (Full HD+) Better | 1080 x 2400 pixels (FHD+) |
| Panel type | IPS LCD Capacitive Touchscreen 90Hz 16 Million Colors | AMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Not listed |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G91 (12nm) | MediaTek Dimensity series (expected mid-range 5G SoC) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A75 @ 2.0GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 1.8GHz | Octa-core |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G series |
| Operating system | Android 14 HIOS 14.5 | Android 15 (with Funtouch OS) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB LPDDR4X (Up to 8GB Extended RAM) | 8GB / 12GB Better |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB eMMC 5.1 | 128GB / 256GB |
| Card slot | Dedicated microSDXC Slot | Yes (microSD, shared SIM slot likely) |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64MP, Sony IMX682 Sensor, f/1.8, PDAF Auxiliary AI Lens Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF) HDR Panorama Night Mode Portrait Mode AI Scene Detection Pro Mode Time-Lapse Slow Motion Super Resolution | 64 MP (wide) MP (depth/macro) 2 MP (depth/macro) LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Selfie camera | 13MP Dual-Color Temperature LED Flash AI Beauty Portrait Mode HDR Face Unlock Selfie Enhancement | 16 MP Better |
| Video recording | 1440p @30fps 1080p @30fps | 1080p / 4K (expected) |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 5000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po battery | Li-Po, non-removable 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 18W Wired Fast Charging | Fast charging (44W / 66W expected) Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM Dual Standby (DSDS) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual standby) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct, Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Bluetooth | v5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor Face Unlock Accelerometer Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor Compass Virtual Gyroscope | Fingerprint (under-display or side-mounted) Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity sensor Compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition or Vivo Y600 Pro?
Vivo Y600 Pro comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 13.2 points. It wins on camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage. TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition and Vivo Y600 Pro in Pakistan?
TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition is listed at PKR 45,999 and Vivo Y600 Pro at PKR 97,999. That makes TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition cheaper by PKR 52,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition or Vivo Y600 Pro?
Vivo Y600 Pro scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition or Vivo Y600 Pro?
Vivo Y600 Pro leads on battery. TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition carries a 5000 mAh cell and Vivo Y600 Pro a 5000 mAh cell, with 18W and 44W wired charging respectively.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition vs Tecno Camon 19 Neo
Vivo Y600 Pro vs Tecno Camon 19 Neo
TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition vs Tecno Camon 19
Vivo Y600 Pro vs Tecno Camon 19
TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition vs TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition
Vivo Y600 Pro vs TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition
TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition vs Realme Narzo N65
Vivo Y600 Pro vs Realme Narzo N65
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.