TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition
Tecno
PKR 45,999
64/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Aug 2026.
The Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 91 against 64 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition is the cheaper of the two at PKR 45,999 against PKR 252,999.
Tecno
PKR 45,999
64/100 overall
Full specs & reviewPoco
PKR 252,999
91/100 overall
Full specs & reviewUp to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra takes it by 26.1 points on our weighted spec score.
you care most about value for money.
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage.
| Specification | TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 45,999 Cheaper | PKR 252,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | October 2024 | March 27, 2025 |
| Dimensions | 168 × 76.4 × 7.7 mm | 160.3 × 75.0 × 8.4 mm |
| Weight | 190 g Better | 212 g |
| Water resistance | IP64 Dust and Splash Resistant | IP68 Dust & Water Resistance Dust-tight protection Water-resistant up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes (manufacturer-rated) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.67 Inches |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2460 pixels (Full HD+) | 1440 × 3200 Pixels (WQHD+) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD Capacitive Touchscreen 90Hz 16 Million Colors | Flow AMOLED 120Hz HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 68 Billion Colors, Always-On Display |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | POCO Shield Glass |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G91 (12nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A75 @ 2.0GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 1.8GHz | Octa-Core Processor 2 × Oryon V2 Phoenix L @ 4.32 GHz 6 × Oryon V2 Phoenix M @ 3.53 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 830 |
| Operating system | Android 14 HIOS 14.5 | Android 15 (HyperOS 2) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB LPDDR4X (Up to 8GB Extended RAM) | 12GB / 16GB LPDDR5X Better |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB eMMC 5.1 | 256GB / 512GB UFS 4.1 Better |
| Card slot | Dedicated microSDXC Slot | No microSD card slot |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64MP, Sony IMX682 Sensor, f/1.8, PDAF Auxiliary AI Lens Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF) HDR Panorama Night Mode Portrait Mode AI Scene Detection Pro Mode Time-Lapse Slow Motion Super Resolution Better | 50 MP Wide, OIS 50 MP Telephoto, OIS, 2.5x Optical Zoom 32 MP Ultra-Wide, 120° FOV Panorama Night Mode Motion Tracking Focus Pro Mode |
| Selfie camera | 13MP Dual-Color Temperature LED Flash AI Beauty Portrait Mode HDR Face Unlock Selfie Enhancement | 32 MP Selfie Camera HDR Better |
| Video recording | 1440p @30fps 1080p @30fps | 8K@24fps 4K@60fps 1080p@240fps 720p@1920fps Slow Motion |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 5000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po battery | 5300mAh Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Ion Battery (Non-removable) Better |
| Wired charging | 18W Wired Fast Charging | 120W HyperCharge Wired Charging 50W Wireless HyperCharge Reverse Wireless Charging Support Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM Dual Standby (DSDS) | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct, Hotspot | Wi-Fi 7 Wi-Fi 6E Dual-Band Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | v5.3, A2DP, LE | 6.0 aptX HD aptX Adaptive aptX Lossless LHDC 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor Face Unlock Accelerometer Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor Compass Virtual Gyroscope | Ultrasonic In-Display Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Compass Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Flicker Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 OTG Support |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 26.1 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage. TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition is listed at PKR 45,999 and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra at PKR 252,999. That makes TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition cheaper by PKR 207,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra scores higher in our camera assessment. TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition uses a 64 MP main sensor against 50 MP on Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra leads on battery. TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition carries a 5000 mAh cell and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra a 5300 mAh cell, with 18W and 120W wired charging respectively.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra is the stronger gaming phone here. TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition runs the MediaTek Helio G91 (12nm) while Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm).
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.