TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition
Tecno
PKR 45,999
64/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Aug 2026.
The Xiaomi Poco F7 is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 80 against 64 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition is the cheaper of the two at PKR 45,999 against PKR 169,999.
Tecno
PKR 45,999
64/100 overall
Full specs & reviewPoco
PKR 169,999
80/100 overall
Full specs & reviewUp to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
Xiaomi Poco F7 takes it by 15.5 points on our weighted spec score.
you care most about value for money.
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage.
| Specification | TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition | Xiaomi Poco F7 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 45,999 Cheaper | PKR 169,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | October 2024 | June 24, 2025 |
| Dimensions | 168 × 76.4 × 7.7 mm | 163.1 × 77.9 × 8.2 mm |
| Weight | 190 g Better | 215.7 g |
| Water resistance | IP64 Dust and Splash Resistant | IP66 + IP68 + IP69 Dust & Water Resistance |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches | 6.83-inch Better |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2460 pixels (Full HD+) | 2772 × 1280 pixels (1.5K resolution) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD Capacitive Touchscreen 90Hz 16 Million Colors | AMOLED 120Hz adaptive refresh rate Dolby Vision support HDR10+ certification Up to 3200 nits peak brightness 3840Hz PWM dimming for reduced eye strain |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G91 (12nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A75 @ 2.0GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 1.8GHz | Octa-Core 1 × Cortex-X4 @ 3.21 GHz 3 × Cortex-A720 @ 3.0 GHz 2 × Cortex-A720 @ 2.8 GHz 2 × Cortex-A720 @ 2.0 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 825 |
| Operating system | Android 14 HIOS 14.5 | Android 15 HyperOS 2 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB LPDDR4X (Up to 8GB Extended RAM) | 12GB LPDDR5X Better |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB eMMC 5.1 | 256GB / 512GB UFS 4.1 Better |
| Card slot | Dedicated microSDXC Slot | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64MP, Sony IMX682 Sensor, f/1.8, PDAF Auxiliary AI Lens Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF) HDR Panorama Night Mode Portrait Mode AI Scene Detection Pro Mode Time-Lapse Slow Motion Super Resolution Better | 50 MP Sony IMX882 Sensor f/1.5 Aperture PDAF Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) Ultra-Wide 8 MP f/2.2 Aperture 120° Field of View LED Flash HDR Panorama Night Mode Portrait Mode AI Camera Pro Mode Time-Lapse Slow Motion Document Mode |
| Selfie camera | 13MP Dual-Color Temperature LED Flash AI Beauty Portrait Mode HDR Face Unlock Selfie Enhancement | 20 MP HDR Portrait AI Beauty Better |
| Video recording | 1440p @30fps 1080p @30fps | 4K @30/60fps 1080p @30/60fps 720p Slow Motion |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 5000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po battery | Silicon-Carbon Li-Po 6500 mAh (Global Version) Better |
| Wired charging | 18W Wired Fast Charging | 90W HyperCharge 22.5W Wired Reverse Charging 0–100% Charging Time: Approximately 40–45 minutes Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM Dual Standby (DSDS) | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby (Dual SIM) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct, Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be Dual-Band Wi-Fi Direct Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | v5.3, A2DP, LE | 6.0 A2DP LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor Face Unlock Accelerometer Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor Compass Virtual Gyroscope | Under-display Optical Fingerprint Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Compass Ambient Light Sensor X-axis Linear Vibration Motor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Xiaomi Poco F7 comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 15.5 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage. TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition is listed at PKR 45,999 and Xiaomi Poco F7 at PKR 169,999. That makes TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition cheaper by PKR 124,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Xiaomi Poco F7 scores higher in our camera assessment. TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition uses a 64 MP main sensor against 50 MP on Xiaomi Poco F7, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Xiaomi Poco F7 leads on battery. TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition carries a 5000 mAh cell and Xiaomi Poco F7 a 6500 mAh cell, with 18W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Xiaomi Poco F7 is the stronger gaming phone here. TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition runs the MediaTek Helio G91 (12nm) while Xiaomi Poco F7 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4nm).
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.