TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition
Tecno
PKR 45,999
64/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition vs ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 90 against 64 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and display. The TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition is the cheaper of the two at PKR 45,999 against PKR 184,999.
ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra
Nubia
PKR 184,999
90/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedZTE nubia Z60 Ultra takes it by 25.3 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition costs PKR 139,000 less.
- ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra charges 62W faster.
- ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra offers 8 GB more RAM.
- ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra ships with 768 GB more storage.
- ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra if…
you care most about performance, camera, display and memory & storage.
Not enough published data to score: Battery & charging. Those categories are excluded from the overall figure rather than estimated.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition | ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 45,999 Cheaper | PKR 184,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | October 2024 | December 2023 |
| Dimensions | 168 × 76.4 × 7.7 mm | 163.98 × 76.35 × 8.78 mm |
| Weight | 190 g Better | 246 g |
| Water resistance | IP64 Dust and Splash Resistant | IP68 (dust/water resistant up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches | 6.8 inches Better |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2460 pixels (Full HD+) | 1116 × 2480 pixels (~400 PPI) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD Capacitive Touchscreen 90Hz 16 Million Colors | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Not listed |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G91 (12nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A75 @ 2.0GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 1.8GHz | Octa-core |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 750 |
| Operating system | Android 14 HIOS 14.5 | Android 14 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB LPDDR4X (Up to 8GB Extended RAM) | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB Better |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB eMMC 5.1 | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB Better |
| Card slot | Dedicated microSDXC Slot | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64MP, Sony IMX682 Sensor, f/1.8, PDAF Auxiliary AI Lens Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF) HDR Panorama Night Mode Portrait Mode AI Scene Detection Pro Mode Time-Lapse Slow Motion Super Resolution | 50 MP (wide, OIS) 50 MP (ultrawide) 64 MP (periscope telephoto, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom) Laser AF HDR, Panorama |
| Selfie camera | 13MP Dual-Color Temperature LED Flash AI Beauty Portrait Mode HDR Face Unlock Selfie Enhancement Better | 12 MP (under-display) |
| Video recording | 1440p @30fps 1080p @30fps | 1080p / 8K video recording |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 5000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po battery | Li-Po non-removable |
| Wired charging | 18W Wired Fast Charging | 80W fast charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM Dual Standby (DSDS) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual standby) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct, Hotspot | Wi-Fi 6/7 |
| Bluetooth | v5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor Face Unlock Accelerometer Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor Compass Virtual Gyroscope | Under-display fingerprint Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition or ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra?
ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 25.3 points. It wins on performance, camera, display and memory & storage. TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition and ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra in Pakistan?
TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition is listed at PKR 45,999 and ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra at PKR 184,999. That makes TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition cheaper by PKR 139,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition or ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra?
ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which is better for gaming, TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition or ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra?
ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra is the stronger gaming phone here. TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition runs the MediaTek Helio G91 (12nm) while ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition vs Tecno Camon 19 Neo
ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra vs Tecno Camon 19 Neo
TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition vs Tecno Camon 19
ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra vs Tecno Camon 19
TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition vs Realme C67
ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra vs Realme C67
TECNO SPARK 30 Bumblebee Edition vs TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition
ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra vs TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.