Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Tecno
PKR 59,999
74/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Spark 30 Pro vs Xiaomi 16 Ultra
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi 16 Ultra is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 88 against 74 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Tecno Spark 30 Pro still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Spark 30 Pro is the cheaper of the two at PKR 59,999 against PKR 409,999.
Xiaomi 16 Ultra
Xiaomi
PKR 409,999
88/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi 16 Ultra takes it by 14.8 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Spark 30 Pro costs PKR 350,000 less.
- Xiaomi 16 Ultra packs a 400 mAh larger battery.
- Xiaomi 16 Ultra charges 57W faster.
- Xiaomi 16 Ultra offers 8 GB more RAM.
- Xiaomi 16 Ultra ships with 768 GB more storage.
- Tecno Spark 30 Pro has a 58 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the Tecno Spark 30 Pro if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the Xiaomi 16 Ultra if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging and memory & storage.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 30 Pro | Xiaomi 16 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 59,999 Cheaper | PKR 409,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | September 2024 | Q1 2026 (China first, Pakistan later via import) |
| Dimensions | 166.6 × 77 × 7.4 mm | 162 × 76 × 9.3 mm |
| Weight | 189 g Better | ~225–235 g |
| Water resistance | IP54 Dust & Splash Resistant | IP68 dust and water resistant |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 Inches | 6.8 inches Better |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2436 Pixels (Full HD+) | 1440 × 3200 pixels (QHD+) Better |
| Panel type | AMOLED, 1 Billion Colors 120Hz Always-On Display (AOD) Punch-hole design 10-bit color support Wet Touch technology Multi-touch capacitive touchscreen | LTPO AMOLED 1–120Hz adaptive HDR10+, Dolby Vision |
| Protection | Not officially specified | Xiaomi Shield Glass |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 (6nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 / Elite (3nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2× Cortex-A76 @ 2.2GHz 6× Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz | Octa-core |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno (next-gen) |
| Operating system | Android 14 with HiOS 14.5 | Android 16 (HyperOS 3) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB (Up to 8GB Memory Fusion) | 12GB / 16GB Better |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB Better |
| Card slot | microSDXC (Dedicated slot, market dependent) | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP, Wide, f/1.9, PDAF (Auto Focus) Secondary Camera: Auxiliary AI Lens Quad-LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Camera Super Night Mode Portrait Mode Pro Mode Time-Lapse Slow Motion Document Scanner Beauty Mode Better | 50 MP, 1-inch sensor, OIS (Sony LYT/L-series) 50 MP, OIS, 5× optical zoom50 MP |
| Selfie camera | 13MP Dual-color LED Flash HDR | 32 MP Better |
| Video recording | 1440p (2K) 1080p @30fps 720p @30fps | 8K@30fps 4K@30/60/120fps Dolby Vision HDR |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh | Si-Carbon ~5400 mAh (expected) Better |
| Wired charging | 33W Fast Charging | 90W wired, 50W wireless, reverse wireless Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-Band Wi-Fi Direct Hotspot | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 A2DP LE | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Under-Display Optical Fingerprint Face Unlock Accelerometer Gyroscope Electronic Compass Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor | Under-display fingerprint (ultrasonic) Accelerometer Gyro Proximity Compass Barometer |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB-C 3.2 / USB 4 (expected) |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Spark 30 Pro or Xiaomi 16 Ultra?
Xiaomi 16 Ultra comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 14.8 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging and memory & storage. Tecno Spark 30 Pro can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Spark 30 Pro and Xiaomi 16 Ultra in Pakistan?
Tecno Spark 30 Pro is listed at PKR 59,999 and Xiaomi 16 Ultra at PKR 409,999. That makes Tecno Spark 30 Pro cheaper by PKR 350,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Spark 30 Pro or Xiaomi 16 Ultra?
Xiaomi 16 Ultra scores higher in our camera assessment. Tecno Spark 30 Pro uses a 108 MP main sensor against 50 MP on Xiaomi 16 Ultra, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Spark 30 Pro or Xiaomi 16 Ultra?
Xiaomi 16 Ultra leads on battery. Tecno Spark 30 Pro carries a 5000 mAh cell and Xiaomi 16 Ultra a 5400 mAh cell, with 33W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Spark 30 Pro or Xiaomi 16 Ultra?
Xiaomi 16 Ultra is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Spark 30 Pro runs the MediaTek Helio G100 (6nm) while Xiaomi 16 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 / Elite (3nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Spark 30 Pro vs Honor X6e
Xiaomi 16 Ultra vs Honor X6e
Tecno Spark 30 Pro vs OnePlus N6x
Xiaomi 16 Ultra vs OnePlus N6x
Tecno Spark 30 Pro vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Xiaomi 16 Ultra vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno Spark 30 Pro vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Xiaomi 16 Ultra vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.