Tecno Spark 40 5G
Tecno
PKR 49,999
74/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Spark 40 5G vs Vivo Y600 Pro
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 7 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Vivo Y600 Pro is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 77 against 74 on our combined specification score. It leads on camera, display and memory & storage. The Tecno Spark 40 5G still wins on battery & charging and value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Spark 40 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 49,999 against PKR 97,999.
Vivo Y600 Pro
Vivo
PKR 97,999
77/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedVivo Y600 Pro takes it by 3 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Spark 40 5G costs PKR 48,000 less.
- Tecno Spark 40 5G packs a 1,000 mAh larger battery.
- Vivo Y600 Pro charges 26W faster.
- Vivo Y600 Pro offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Vivo Y600 Pro has a 14 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Vivo Y600 Pro uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Spark 40 5G if…
you care most about battery & charging and value for money.
Buy the Vivo Y600 Pro if…
you care most about camera, display and memory & storage.
Not enough published data to score: Performance. Those categories are excluded from the overall figure rather than estimated.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 40 5G | Vivo Y600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 49,999 Cheaper | PKR 97,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2025 | April 2026 |
| Dimensions | 167.69 × 77.87 × 7.99 mm | Not listed |
| Weight | Not officially specified | Not listed |
| Water resistance | IP64 Certified | No confirmed protection |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.67 inches | 6.67 inches |
| Resolution | 720 × 1600 pixels (HD+) | 1080 x 2400 pixels (FHD+) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD 120Hz Up to 700 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate |
| Protection | Panda Glass | Not listed |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 5G+ | MediaTek Dimensity series (expected mid-range 5G SoC) |
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G series |
| Operating system | Android 15 HiOS 15 | Android 15 (with Funtouch OS) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB LPDDR4X (Memory Fusion (Virtual RAM) Up to 8GB Extended RAM) | 8GB / 12GB Better |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 | 128GB / 256GB |
| Card slot | microSDXC Dedicated microSD card slot (market dependent) Expandable storage up to 1TB (market dependent) | Yes (microSD, shared SIM slot likely) |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP, Wide AI Lens Autofocus Dual LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Scene Recognition Night Mode Portrait Mode Beauty Mode Pro Mode Super Resolution Time-Lapse Slow Motion AI Camera Filters Document Scanner QR Code Scanner Continuous Shooting | 64 MP (wide) MP (depth/macro) 2 MP (depth/macro) LED flash, HDR, panorama Better |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP Wide Portrait Mode HDR Face Retouch Filters Gesture Capture Smile Capture | 16 MP Better |
| Video recording | 1080p @ 30fps 720p @ 30fps Dual Video Time-Lapse Video Slow Motion Video | 1080p / 4K (expected) |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 6000 mAh Better | Li-Po, non-removable 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 18W Fast Charging | Fast charging (44W / 66W expected) Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual standby) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Wi-Fi Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Scanner Face Unlock Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor Accelerometer (G-Sensor) Electronic Compass Virtual Gyroscope Infrared Remote Sensor | Fingerprint (under-display or side-mounted) Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity sensor Compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Spark 40 5G or Vivo Y600 Pro?
Vivo Y600 Pro comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 3 points. It wins on camera, display and memory & storage. Tecno Spark 40 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Spark 40 5G and Vivo Y600 Pro in Pakistan?
Tecno Spark 40 5G is listed at PKR 49,999 and Vivo Y600 Pro at PKR 97,999. That makes Tecno Spark 40 5G cheaper by PKR 48,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Spark 40 5G or Vivo Y600 Pro?
Vivo Y600 Pro scores higher in our camera assessment. Tecno Spark 40 5G uses a 50 MP main sensor against 64 MP on Vivo Y600 Pro, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Spark 40 5G or Vivo Y600 Pro?
Tecno Spark 40 5G leads on battery. Tecno Spark 40 5G carries a 6000 mAh cell and Vivo Y600 Pro a 5000 mAh cell, with 18W and 44W wired charging respectively.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Spark 40 5G vs Tecno Spark 30 5G
Vivo Y600 Pro vs Tecno Spark 30 5G
Tecno Spark 40 5G vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro
Vivo Y600 Pro vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro
Tecno Spark 40 5G vs TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition
Vivo Y600 Pro vs TECNO POVA 5 Pro 5G Free Fire Special Edition
Tecno Spark 40 5G vs Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G
Vivo Y600 Pro vs Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.