Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno
PKR 64,999
65/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Vivo V60 512GB
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 9 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Vivo V60 512GB is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 83 against 65 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and display. The Tecno Spark 50 5G still wins on battery & charging and value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Spark 50 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 64,999 against PKR 159,999.
Vivo V60 512GB
Vivo
PKR 159,999
83/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedVivo V60 512GB takes it by 18.4 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Spark 50 5G costs PKR 95,000 less.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G packs a 1,500 mAh larger battery.
- Vivo V60 512GB charges 35W faster.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Vivo V60 512GB ships with 256 GB more storage.
- Vivo V60 512GB uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Spark 50 5G if…
you care most about battery & charging and value for money.
Buy the Vivo V60 512GB if…
you care most about performance, camera, display and memory & storage.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 50 5G | Vivo V60 512GB |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 64,999 Cheaper | PKR 159,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 2, 2026 (Global Announcement) | (Expected Q4 2025 in Pakistan) |
| Dimensions | 167.9 × 79.3 × 8.18 mm | ≈ 164.4 × 74.8 × 7.5 mm |
| Weight | Around 205–210 g (varies by market) | ≈ 185 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP64 Dust and Water Resistance | No official IP rating |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 720 × 1600 pixels (HD+) | 1080 × 2400 pixels (~388 PPI) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD Up to 700 nits (HBM) 120Hz Adaptive Refresh Rate Eye Care Mode Reading Mode Dark Mode | AMOLED, 120Hz |
| Protection | Standard scratch-resistant glass (official type not disclosed) | Schott Xensation Glass (Vivo standard) |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A76 Performance Cores 6 × Cortex-A55 Efficiency Cores | Octa-core (1×2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 + 3×2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4×1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 720 |
| Operating system | Android 16 HiOS 16 | Android 14 (Funtouch OS 14) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB LPDDR4X Supports Memory Fusion (Virtual RAM) up to 16GB (market dependent) Better | 8 GB / 12 GB |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 | 512 GB Better |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated microSD card slot) | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP f/1.8 PDAF AI Lens LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Photography FlashSnap Night Mode Portrait Mode Beauty Mode AI Scene Detection | 50 MP (wide, OIS) 8 MP (ultra-wide) |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP Single LED Flash Beauty Mode AI Portrait HDR | 50 MP (AF) Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30fps 720p@30fps | 4K@30fps 1080p@30/60fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 6500 mAh (some regional variants list 6150 mAh rated capacity) Better | 5000 mAh (Li-Po, non-removable) |
| Wired charging | 45W Super Charging | 80W wired fast charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct, Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | v5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Scanner Accelerometer Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor E-Compass Virtual Gyroscope | Under-display fingerprint (optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo V60 512GB?
Vivo V60 512GB comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 18.4 points. It wins on performance, camera, display and memory & storage. Tecno Spark 50 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Spark 50 5G and Vivo V60 512GB in Pakistan?
Tecno Spark 50 5G is listed at PKR 64,999 and Vivo V60 512GB at PKR 159,999. That makes Tecno Spark 50 5G cheaper by PKR 95,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo V60 512GB?
Vivo V60 512GB scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo V60 512GB?
Tecno Spark 50 5G leads on battery. Tecno Spark 50 5G carries a 6500 mAh cell and Vivo V60 512GB a 5000 mAh cell, with 45W and 80W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo V60 512GB?
Vivo V60 512GB is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Spark 50 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) while Vivo V60 512GB runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Vivo V60 512GB vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Vivo V60 512GB vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Vivo V60 512GB vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Vivo V60 512GB vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.