Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno
PKR 64,999
65/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Vivo X300s
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 9 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Vivo X300s is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 93 against 65 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and display. The Tecno Spark 50 5G still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Spark 50 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 64,999 against PKR 217,999.
Vivo X300s
Vivo
PKR 217,999
93/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedVivo X300s takes it by 27.5 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Spark 50 5G costs PKR 153,000 less.
- Vivo X300s charges 55W faster.
- Vivo X300s ships with 768 GB more storage.
- Vivo X300s uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Spark 50 5G if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the Vivo X300s if…
you care most about performance, camera, display and memory & storage.
Not enough published data to score: Battery & charging. Those categories are excluded from the overall figure rather than estimated.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 50 5G | Vivo X300s |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 64,999 Cheaper | PKR 217,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 2, 2026 (Global Announcement) | 2026 (October–December) |
| Dimensions | 167.9 × 79.3 × 8.18 mm | 164 × 75 × 8.5 mm |
| Weight | Around 205–210 g (varies by market) | 195 – 205 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP64 Dust and Water Resistance | IP68/IP69 water & dust resistance |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 720 × 1600 pixels (HD+) | 1260 x 2800 pixels (approx.) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD Up to 700 nits (HBM) 120Hz Adaptive Refresh Rate Eye Care Mode Reading Mode Dark Mode | AMOLED / LTPO AMOLED 120Hz |
| Protection | Standard scratch-resistant glass (official type not disclosed) | Schott Xensation / Gorilla Glass |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 or Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A76 Performance Cores 6 × Cortex-A55 Efficiency Cores | Octa-core (flagship level) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Latest generation GPU (Adreno / Immortalis) |
| Operating system | Android 16 HiOS 16 | Android 15 (Funtouch OS / OriginOS ) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB LPDDR4X Supports Memory Fusion (Virtual RAM) up to 16GB (market dependent) | 12GB / 16GB |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB Better |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated microSD card slot) | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP f/1.8 PDAF AI Lens LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Photography FlashSnap Night Mode Portrait Mode Beauty Mode AI Scene Detection | 50 MP (wide, OIS) 50 MP (ultrawide) 50 MP (periscope telephoto, OIS, zoom) ZEISS optics, HDR, panorama |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP Single LED Flash Beauty Mode AI Portrait HDR | 32 MP or 50 MP (expected) Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30fps 720p@30fps | 4K / 8K recording (expected) |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 6500 mAh (some regional variants list 6150 mAh rated capacity) | Li-Po (non-removable) |
| Wired charging | 45W Super Charging | 100W wired fast charging 50W wireless (expected) Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct, Hotspot | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | v5.4 | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Scanner Accelerometer Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor E-Compass Virtual Gyroscope | Under-display fingerprint (ultrasonic likely) Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C (likely USB 3.x) |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo X300s?
Vivo X300s comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 27.5 points. It wins on performance, camera, display and memory & storage. Tecno Spark 50 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Spark 50 5G and Vivo X300s in Pakistan?
Tecno Spark 50 5G is listed at PKR 64,999 and Vivo X300s at PKR 217,999. That makes Tecno Spark 50 5G cheaper by PKR 153,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo X300s?
Vivo X300s scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo X300s?
Vivo X300s is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Spark 50 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) while Vivo X300s runs the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 or Snapdragon 8 Gen 4.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Vivo X300s vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Vivo X300s vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Vivo X300s vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Vivo X300s vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.