Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno
PKR 64,999
63/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Vivo Y200 256GB
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 9 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Vivo Y200 256GB is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 73 against 63 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and display. The Tecno Spark 50 5G still wins on battery & charging and memory & storage, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Vivo Y200 256GB is the cheaper of the two at PKR 62,999 against PKR 64,999.
Vivo Y200 256GB
Vivo
PKR 62,999
73/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedVivo Y200 256GB takes it by 10 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Vivo Y200 256GB costs PKR 2,000 less.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G packs a 1,700 mAh larger battery.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G charges 1W faster.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G offers 8 GB more RAM.
- Vivo Y200 256GB has a 14 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Vivo Y200 256GB uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Spark 50 5G if…
you care most about battery & charging and memory & storage.
Buy the Vivo Y200 256GB if…
you care most about performance, camera, display and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 50 5G | Vivo Y200 256GB |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 64,999 | PKR 62,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 2, 2026 (Global Announcement) | 2025 (expected in Pakistan) |
| Dimensions | 167.9 × 79.3 × 8.18 mm | 162.3 × 74.8 × 7.7 mm |
| Weight | Around 205–210 g (varies by market) | 190 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP64 Dust and Water Resistance | Not listed |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 720 × 1600 pixels (HD+) | 1080 × 2400 pixels (~395 ppi) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD Up to 700 nits (HBM) 120Hz Adaptive Refresh Rate Eye Care Mode Reading Mode Dark Mode | AMOLED, HDR10+, 120Hz |
| Protection | Standard scratch-resistant glass (official type not disclosed) | Schott Xensation / Gorilla Glass |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A76 Performance Cores 6 × Cortex-A55 Efficiency Cores | Octa-core (2×2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6×1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| Operating system | Android 16 HiOS 16 | Android 14 with Funtouch OS |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB LPDDR4X Supports Memory Fusion (Virtual RAM) up to 16GB (market dependent) Better | 8 GB |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 | 256 GB |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated microSD card slot) | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP f/1.8 PDAF AI Lens LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Photography FlashSnap Night Mode Portrait Mode Beauty Mode AI Scene Detection | 64 MP wide (OIS) + 2 MP depth Better |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP Single LED Flash Beauty Mode AI Portrait HDR | 16 MP wide Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30fps 720p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 6500 mAh (some regional variants list 6150 mAh rated capacity) Better | Non-removable Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45W Super Charging Better | 44W wired fast charging |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual Nano-SIM, dual standby |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct, Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | v5.4 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Scanner Accelerometer Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor E-Compass Virtual Gyroscope | Fingerprint (under-display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo Y200 256GB?
Vivo Y200 256GB comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 10 points. It wins on performance, camera, display and value for money. Tecno Spark 50 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Spark 50 5G and Vivo Y200 256GB in Pakistan?
Tecno Spark 50 5G is listed at PKR 64,999 and Vivo Y200 256GB at PKR 62,999. That makes Vivo Y200 256GB cheaper by PKR 2,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo Y200 256GB?
Vivo Y200 256GB scores higher in our camera assessment. Tecno Spark 50 5G uses a 50 MP main sensor against 64 MP on Vivo Y200 256GB, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo Y200 256GB?
Tecno Spark 50 5G leads on battery. Tecno Spark 50 5G carries a 6500 mAh cell and Vivo Y200 256GB a 4800 mAh cell, with 45W and 44W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo Y200 256GB?
Vivo Y200 256GB is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Spark 50 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) while Vivo Y200 256GB runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (6 nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Vivo Y200 256GB vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Honor X6e
Vivo Y200 256GB vs Honor X6e
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Vivo Y200 256GB vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Vivo Y200 256GB vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.