Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno
PKR 64,999
65/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Xiaomi 15T
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 9 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi 15T is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 85 against 65 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and display. The Tecno Spark 50 5G still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Spark 50 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 64,999 against PKR 169,999.
Xiaomi 15T
Xiaomi
PKR 169,999
85/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi 15T takes it by 20 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Spark 50 5G costs PKR 105,000 less.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G packs a 1,000 mAh larger battery.
- Xiaomi 15T charges 22W faster.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Xiaomi 15T ships with 256 GB more storage.
- Xiaomi 15T uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Spark 50 5G if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the Xiaomi 15T if…
you care most about performance, camera, display and memory & storage.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 50 5G | Xiaomi 15T |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 64,999 Cheaper | PKR 169,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 2, 2026 (Global Announcement) | September 24, 2025 (available) |
| Dimensions | 167.9 × 79.3 × 8.18 mm | 163.2 × 78.0 × 7.5 mm |
| Weight | Around 205–210 g (varies by market) | 194 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP64 Dust and Water Resistance | Not listed |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches | 6.83 inches Better |
| Resolution | 720 × 1600 pixels (HD+) | 1280 × 2772 pixels (~447 ppi) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD Up to 700 nits (HBM) 120Hz Adaptive Refresh Rate Eye Care Mode Reading Mode Dark Mode | AMOLED (68-billion-colour), HDR10+, 120 Hz |
| Protection | Standard scratch-resistant glass (official type not disclosed) | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra (4 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A76 Performance Cores 6 × Cortex-A55 Efficiency Cores | Octa-core (1×3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 + 3×3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 + 4×2.1 GHz Cortex-A725) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G720 MP7 |
| Operating system | Android 16 HiOS 16 | Android 15 with HyperOS 2 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB LPDDR4X Supports Memory Fusion (Virtual RAM) up to 16GB (market dependent) Better | 12 GB |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 | 256 GB / 512 GB Better |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated microSD card slot) | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP f/1.8 PDAF AI Lens LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Photography FlashSnap Night Mode Portrait Mode Beauty Mode AI Scene Detection | 50 MP wide (OIS) + 50 MP telephoto (2× optical zoom) + 12 MP ultra-wide |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP Single LED Flash Beauty Mode AI Portrait HDR | 32 MP wide Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30fps 720p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p up to 240fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 6500 mAh (some regional variants list 6150 mAh rated capacity) Better | Non-removable Li-Po ~5500 mAh (typical) |
| Wired charging | 45W Super Charging | 67 W wired charging; no wireless charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM support, IP68 dust/water resistant |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct, Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | v5.4 | Bluetooth 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Scanner Accelerometer Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor E-Compass Virtual Gyroscope | Fingerprint (under-display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C (USB 2.0), OTG support |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Xiaomi 15T?
Xiaomi 15T comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 20 points. It wins on performance, camera, display and memory & storage. Tecno Spark 50 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Spark 50 5G and Xiaomi 15T in Pakistan?
Tecno Spark 50 5G is listed at PKR 64,999 and Xiaomi 15T at PKR 169,999. That makes Tecno Spark 50 5G cheaper by PKR 105,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Xiaomi 15T?
Xiaomi 15T scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Xiaomi 15T?
Xiaomi 15T is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Spark 50 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) while Xiaomi 15T runs the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra (4 nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Xiaomi 15T vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Xiaomi 15T vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Xiaomi 15T vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Xiaomi 15T vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.